My latest account, read on Dec 12th shows an electricity reading of
-266kwh equalling an amount of $-57. How ridiculous to imply that I've used minus electricity
On the other hand if you'd just hoofed the PITA out you'd have lots of negative billssundaymorningstaple wrote: If both fell in the Estimation range for the same quarter, then you could end up with a whopper of a bill, especially if you got lucky while on Hols and brought back the new beau to spend several weeks here!![]()
sundaymorningstaple wrote:They are not implying anything. They take your average for base period and based on that, estimate your current usage. If your usage actually went down considerably, then it's possible that you could have a negative bill on the month that they actually take the readings. As each month tells you whether or not it's an actual reading or an estimation, then it should be rather obvious that if, in the current month, say, you were on hols and the house was shut up with no, or very little, consumption, then when the reading were taken there are obviously going to be extremely low. Shouldn't need rocket science to figure that one out. You could also end up with the reverse if you had a break one month and through out the dude so only half the bits of protoplasm are wandering around the flat and the next month you decided to to a trip back to Oz for 2 or 3 weeks. If both fell in the Estimation range for the same quarter, then you could end up with a whopper of a bill, especially if you got lucky while on Hols and brought back the new beau to spend several weeks here!![]()
Normally under the heading of 'Current Month Charges' each of the services will tell you, like in my case this month, "Electricity Estimated on 30-11/2009" whereas my bill the month before said "Reading taken on 30-10-2009" therefore designating that they actually read my meter on that date. The water reading/estimation will be the same while on the other hand, things like Refuse Removal will remain fixed. Water Conservation & GST taxes will vary based on the actual/estimated charges for the water consumption.
Sorted now?
I'm guessing to cut down costs.MinSG wrote: My only question is, why can't they do actual reading every month?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests