Implants For nose?

Everything about beauty enhancement discussion.
Post Reply
Mcdohl
Member
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:19 am

Implants For nose?

Post by Mcdohl » Sat, 17 Oct 2009 4:10 pm

Is silicone good for implanting on nose?
Does it has a life span where u need to change a new silicone?
Basically cartillage on the ear,serptal,rib,carnium is it better than silicone?

If u guys want to increase the nasal bridge what u guys will use?

User avatar
sundaymorningstaple
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39647
Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
Answers: 10
Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot

Post by sundaymorningstaple » Sat, 17 Oct 2009 5:14 pm

This has been discussed ad nauseum on this forum. Try using the search function. There's literally thousands of posts discussing the pro's & con's of body butchery here.
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers

Mcdohl
Member
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:19 am

Post by Mcdohl » Sat, 17 Oct 2009 7:20 pm

sorry but i cant find it can u link it to me?

Mcdohl
Member
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:19 am

Post by Mcdohl » Sat, 17 Oct 2009 7:27 pm

k nvm i found it thanks

boii18
Reporter
Reporter
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 3:14 pm

Post by boii18 » Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:07 pm

silicone
pros : easier for surgeon, old material used for many years with high safety profile, less damage to the nose in the short term, sharp effect, easy to remove, revision is easy, alot of size makes lots of choices for surgeon to create best effect, can build a high bridge, removal hardly damages nasal tissue ....
cons : can be movable if planted supraperiosteally, in the long term ( more than 5-10 years ) has to be removed as the risks start to increase drastically, is not a permanent implantation material, may look abit fake, cheaper.

goretex
pros : more sturdy as it interweaves with nasal tissue, more natural, more blunt augmentation, SUPPOSED to last longer than silicone.
cons : higher infection risk than silicone, warping if goretex sheets are used, deviation is hard to correct, harder to use for surgeon, less variety of sizes, long-term usage unpredictable as its a new material, removal means lots of damage to nasal tissue and is difficult, looks thicker than silicone block, more expensive..

rib cartilage for bridge, ear cartilage for tip
pros : supposed to last forever, natural effect, sharpness/bluntness can be customised.
cons : much more expensive, rib scar ( if use your own, can also use dead body cartilage ), ear scar, rejection, infection risk, high risk of warping and re-absorbing in first few months, may require revision, unpredictable, pls find a surgeon who specialise in rib rhinoplasty only.

Mcdohl
Member
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:19 am

Post by Mcdohl » Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:22 am

Sorry but boii i thought silicone wasw to lasted permanently??for life??
which implant u think is the best?

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Aesthetic Enhancement & Cosmetic Surgery”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests