And.sundaymorningstaple wrote:R.N.T. I think you, perhaps, misread the message you quoted?
Bocat32 very aptly described that he wanted "as Singaporean" an experience as possible. How can that be any kind of insinuation that you or anybody else is Singapore-phobic for using an international type school? I think you are being a wee bit sensitive. One would have to admit, getting down in the trenches "with the locals" is a lot different than sitting up on high and "observing" how the locals live.
I didn't want to move to another country/culture and then not experience any of it!
Wow. They weren't kidding.... denial ain't just a river in Egypt. Honey you've got it bad if you really believe this. 'Negating the Singapore experience'? How can you be serious? I never said SAS was a Singapore experience, just not a place to run and hide from it like people here constantly insinuate. For us it's a good balance. Most of my kids teachers are not American, or have lived outside the US all their adult lives. Honestly ~ where do you get your information? Still grieving because they wanted to foist the Admissions Director on you to take the tour, when that is her job? Sheesh!boffenl wrote:It IS a choice--you choose to send your kid to an American school thereby negating the Singapore experience by having teachers who are American, an American curricula, American textbooks and on-campus food that is OVERWHELMINGLY American. PLEASE do not try to dissuade any of us into thinking SAS is a "Singapore" experience--it is NOT. But that is your CHOICE--not good or bad, but a choice!
I'm not making you feel bad about anything. That's up to you entirely. Sounds more like you're trying to justify not spending the $300K by belittling my expat experience. That's rationalization, pure and simple. You're way, way off base here ~ be happy your child has found a good school and leave it at that. You don't have to drag down the International Schools with misinformation just to paint your own school in a better light. They can both be good. You can keep flogging the local school experience, but why does it have to be at my expense?Shame on you for making me feel bad for not spending $300,000 on her primary education at SAS. Shame RNT!
P.S. I'm not back, as I didn't go. The local school option is not 'bugging the crap out of me', and you're the one shaking in outrage, not me. Honestly, we can all make whatever choices are best for our kids without maligning the other. Why this is so difficult I don't know.boffenl wrote:Glad to see RNT is back again--wondering when the local school option would bug the crap out of you! I am shaking with outrage right now and can barely type.
Sounds to me like I've hit the nail on the head. Frankly, not sure what you are implying in your last sentence though. Are you saying I should consider that you are more than your husband's bank account? That's a strange thing to say. But to ease your troubled mind, I DO consider you as more. More like a drain on your husband's bank account. Is that what you mean?road.not.taken wrote:And I have come to the conclusion you'd rather play the 'Aw Shucks I'm Just a Poor Farm Boy' card then consider I am more than my husband's bank account.sundaymorningstaple wrote:And.
There.
You.
Go.
Again.
I've come to the conclusion you are really sad.
Please let us know what company are you working in. Implying Singapore as a 3rd world country proven to be a very bad mistake your company had made to set up an office here.road.not.taken wrote: And by the way? We don't pay our school fees, our company does. Being classified as a 3rd world country, local schools were off limits to company employees when we moved here.
Maybe you should study history a little bit. Additionally, maybe you should find out who you are knocking. She's been here only a few years less that I have and when both of us arrived here, this nation was still a 3rd world country. It had not been given "developing nation" status at that time. So in this case you are way, way off the mark. Okay, lah?ok lah wrote:Please let us know what company are you working in. Implying Singapore as a 3rd world country proven to be a very bad mistake your company had made to set up an office here.road.not.taken wrote: And by the way? We don't pay our school fees, our company does. Being classified as a 3rd world country, local schools were off limits to company employees when we moved here.
Maybe I should study history but not the history of Singapore; I should have studied the history of RNT's arrival. Based on your ( and RNT) assumption that Singapore was a 3rd World Country, well, it seems nobody here dare to rebuke, considering you and RNT have been here for 20 odd years, coming 30 perhaps? Back to the comment made by RNT, how would anyone know, especially new comers to Singapore Expat Forum, that RNT has been here for a long period. Probably she could be here 2 days , 2 months or 2 years ago. Was Singapore a 3rd world country 2 years ago? How many expats know enough about the history of Singapore? I am not too concerned with what RNT said but what the newcomers think after reading what RNT commented.sundaymorningstaple wrote: Maybe you should study history a little bit. Additionally, maybe you should find out who you are knocking. She's been here only a few years less that I have and when both of us arrived here, this nation was still a 3rd world country. It had not been given "developing nation" status at that time. So in this case you are way, way off the mark. Okay, lah?
Yes, as SMS pointed out - assumption is the wrong word here. Singapore was very much considered a hardship posting back in those days. I mean, come on ~ three TV channels and two of them called Channel 12?ok lah wrote:Based on your ( and RNT) assumption that Singapore was a 3rd World Country
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests