Ouch - the 38 post versus 1000+ jibe. Shit mate, I know nothing. Is this what is all about? My c**ks bigger than yours?sierra2469alpha wrote:Read, rinse, repeat. READ. Then try to think and help people out for a change. It's ACTUALLY really easy to be nice.
Rattlesnake - get off your hobby horse with 38 posts.
Post something useful for a change. Some of us might like your otherwise good posts. Got the hint, now?
Nah, mate . . . your head's too big to fit anywhere, isn't it . . . I've no fog in this fight but you are clearly the aggro one, which isn't always bad, but you're thick to boot.bigfilsing wrote:To quote GLCQuasimodo wrote:That suits your m.o. more likely.bigfilsing wrote:
You're clearly just itching for a bash aren;t you mate. typical!
Sierra is passionate and you are simply an oaf
"I've tried seeing it from your point of view but i couldn't fit my head up your arsehole too"
You better hope we're not talking about a pearl necklace from another bloke.pearls of wisdom in my face.
I never really thought of it that way. Not one of those images that is front of mind for me. Do you want to come out on the forum? Shouldn't you at least tell your Mum and Dad first?Quasimodo wrote: rattlesnake wrote:[/b]You better hope we're not talking about a pearl necklace from another bloke.pearls of wisdom in my face.
rattlesnake wrote:Ouch - the 38 post versus 1000+ jibe. Shit mate, I know nothing. Is this what is all about? My c**ks bigger than yours?sierra2469alpha wrote:Read, rinse, repeat. READ. Then try to think and help people out for a change. It's ACTUALLY really easy to be nice.
Rattlesnake - get off your hobby horse with 38 posts.
Post something useful for a change. Some of us might like your otherwise good posts. Got the hint, now?
Get real - I might have only posted a small number of times, but what I have seen in my limited time here is that you tend to miss the point and argue a tangent quite a bit - and you don't like getting called on it.
BTW - this is the second time in my 38 posts you have waved your 1000+ pearls of wisdom in my face. Are you insecure?
OK thanks Taxico- at last I'm being understood. Yeah this is what I thought would be the case. And Carteki- to clarify, one is not normally given the big search just because one has declared nothing. Although last Christmas the 3 hrs in queues when I'd declared nothing brought me close to a wee 'tanti' at the final stage of that queue.taxico wrote:the last 3 years saw me flying through/to australia/NZ regularly.carteki wrote:but if you declare something they don't check the rest of the luggage - major control breakdown.
when i do declare the food i have, i'm always subjected to a thorough baggage search and questioning. i do not hold an australian or new zealand passport.
the first time i brought in green tomato ketchup as a gift for a friend in sydney. the second time i had a few boxes of frosties (they don't have them where i'm at in NZ).
after those 2 occasions, i no longer bring any food with me, coz i feel it's not worth the hassle.
Oh NOW I get it! You and others thought that I would want to bring stuff in and not declare it. Nah nah...what I meant was IF I bring sosmething in - which I obviously then have to declare, how much queue grief can I expect compared to having NOTHING to declare? Does THAT make more sense? Taxico's answer seems about right. And by the way- "JUST a delay in a queue?! " Read my post- " Last December. Tullamarine.3 hours."sierra2469alpha wrote:Ozchick - sheesh! Protecting your home country means naught?!!! If it's just a delay in a queue, what's the issue? Again, you DON'T have to bring it in - it's a choice! Is the foodstuff THAT important?
Quarantine exists for a reason.
People that cheat it get what they deserve, IMHO
Mr. P
Is that it ...honestly .....LOLQuasimodo wrote:bigfilsing wrote:No wonder you write such crap if you think this is a bingo game.Bingo ....we have a winner ladies and gentlemen
Sierra can I politely suggest you Read, rinse, repeat. READ. Then try to think and help people out for a change.Ozchick wrote:Oh NOW I get it! You and others thought that I would want to bring stuff in and not declare it. Nah nah...what I meant was IF I bring sosmething in - which I obviously then have to declare, how much queue grief can I expect compared to having NOTHING to declare? Does THAT make more sense? Taxico's answer seems about right. And by the way- "JUST a delay in a queue?! " Read my post- " Last December. Tullamarine.3 hours."sierra2469alpha wrote:Ozchick - sheesh! Protecting your home country means naught?!!! If it's just a delay in a queue, what's the issue? Again, you DON'T have to bring it in - it's a choice! Is the foodstuff THAT important?
Quarantine exists for a reason.
People that cheat it get what they deserve, IMHO
Mr. P
Put yourself there, are YOU happy?! No, I don't think so!" That's 3 hours on top of the 7 it took to get there. No explanations. No apologies. Sweet bugger all! Oh sweet sweet Changi Airport. Thank God for you! I luv ya!
Nano nano earthling. Ifucnridthisursik.bigfilsing wrote:Is that it ...honestly .....LOLQuasimodo wrote:bigfilsing wrote:No wonder you write such crap if you think this is a bingo game.Bingo ....we have a winner ladies and gentlemen
You might need to undersrtand a little bit of sarcasim ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest