Doesn't change a thing really, it was the power of the people who made the changes and that's how it should be! Who needs a government of MP's that have been siphoning the tax payers money for the last 300 years and have always protested about coming clean on their expense accounts. The whole shabby affair is a world wide scandal, of typical British rule, they should be wiped out completely and a new beginning, the whole standards of Britian have dropped significantly in the last 40 years. Because of the old boys club!sundaymorningstaple wrote:Guess that means you will have to tone down your anti-british government rhetoric a wee bit, now don't it. Looks like they are capable of doing some good after all.
Then why don't these same people make the changes then? Must be cause they are tolerant of the government and tacitly approve of what the government does then. right? If people power could get the Gurkha's their rights then they should be able to do most anything including toppling the current government I should think?ksl wrote:Doesn't change a thing really, it was the power of the people who made the changes and that's how it should be!sundaymorningstaple wrote:Guess that means you will have to tone down your anti-british government rhetoric a wee bit, now don't it. Looks like they are capable of doing some good after all.
Perhaps what ksl should have mentioned is a well know TV personality (Joanna Lumley) led the campaign - made a useful diversion away from the current issues of the economy and MP's expenses!sundaymorningstaple wrote:
Then why don't these same people make the changes then? Must be cause they are tolerant of the government and tacitly approve of what the government does then. right? If people power could get the Gurkha's their rights then they should be able to do most anything including toppling the current government I should think?
Just 'avin a bit o' fun this afternoon.
Actually SMS you are quite right, unfortunately the way the politics are handled in UK, it's not only a political challenge, but a web of deceit, or even conspiracy, to move and dodge with the times, so that they can hang onto the power. Not unlike Singapore really, the power is moved around between parties, yet they are all members of the same party, how long is a piece of string? That is why the UK is a 100 light years, from democracy and its still run by the old boys network, possibly the Masons are also involved who really knows. New Labour my backside....it's just another extension of strategy to hang on, and rape the privy purse and expenses are just perks of raping the public. Typical of civil service employment tooPlavt wrote:Perhaps what ksl should have mentioned is a well know TV personality (Joanna Lumley) led the campaign - made a useful diversion away from the current issues of the economy and MP's expenses!sundaymorningstaple wrote:
Then why don't these same people make the changes then? Must be cause they are tolerant of the government and tacitly approve of what the government does then. right? If people power could get the Gurkha's their rights then they should be able to do most anything including toppling the current government I should think?
Just 'avin a bit o' fun this afternoon.
Nath21 wrote: The real question you have to ask is why would they want to live there? bad weather, bad food and worst hospitals in the world (ive seen cleaner abattoirs in third world countries than the British hospitals). They must be deep in their heart trance fans.
Exactly! But at least they the Gurkhas have earned it, having been short changed in the way they have been paid. They have always been on the front line with our troops, they deserve every penny!ScoobyDoes wrote:Nath21 wrote: The real question you have to ask is why would they want to live there? bad weather, bad food and worst hospitals in the world (ive seen cleaner abattoirs in third world countries than the British hospitals). They must be deep in their heart trance fans.
What, and miss out on all that free benefits money from the government?
Yes unfortunately that is true, although many are history today, the Gurkhas are still a major part of the British (contingency) and it's about time they are recognised as a factual necessity or not.Quasimodo wrote:And what about the old colonial troops that stood by Britain's side in any war they fought.
The Gurkhas are a cause celebre, and quite rightly so, but you're leaving otu many, many more who laid down their lives for King/Queen and country.
Nath21 wrote:Its easy to get to Britain they could have just attended a dodgy college run by foreign insurgents, got a dodgy politician to put the 36,000 qualifying Gurkhas on weekly expense claim, hoped on lorry from France or just flown and claimed political asylum.
The real question you have to ask is why would they want to live there? bad weather, bad food and worst hospitals in the world (ive seen cleaner abattoirs in third world countries than the British hospitals). They must be deep in their heart trance fans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests