Only downside of FZ50 is the aperture which is f/11.....taxico wrote:i'm living in a very backward part of the world and they don't have the LX4 here, and i've never tried it out yet.
i love my LX2, and will buy an LX3 in singapore later this year before they disappear.
LX3 is a very good camera. i wouldn't go for an LX4.
to quote someone from another forum:
There's one thing I have learned ABUNDANTLY well over time: The very best cameras don't get "improved" -- they get "ruined" in updates. Or they don't get "updated" at all. Just ask the FZ50 folks, or the Canon Pro1 folks, or a whole bunch of other folks who've had one of those "special" cameras made by the various manufacturers over time.
This will be true of all digital cameras with small sensors... and the FZ50, like many others, has a 5x7 mm sensor.Zeenit wrote:Only downside of FZ50 is the aperture which is f/11.....
Sounds like this was written by an anti-zoom afficiando... from photo.net, possibly.taxico wrote:...they'd have to do one of the following:
1. Make the lens bigger, requiring a physically bigger camera.
2. Make the lens slower, ruining one of the best characteristics of the LX3.
3. Make the sensor smaller, ruining the LX3's excellent image quality.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest