I did a strike off last year. It takes about six months to do, requiring publication of notices, etc. The whole point is to protect creditors and keep you from shutting down while owing money. Because my company was essentially in stasis, my accountant charged me $500 plus expenses to shut it down.stiwi wrote:Has anyone gone through it? I have also been quoted $2500 excluding GST. From what I read here it only cost $35 to fill the application form, so the amount I was quoted is excessive unless there are some other fees I am not aware of?
From what I know the company must close the bank account first before submitting the application, but before that Director's report and tax clearance has to be prepared and any taxes due have to be paid.
Would it be best striking off before financial year end, after or it doesn't matter?
Thanks.Strong Eagle wrote: I did a strike off last year. It takes about six months to do, requiring publication of notices, etc. The whole point is to protect creditors and keep you from shutting down while owing money. Because my company was essentially in stasis, my accountant charged me $500 plus expenses to shut it down.
As to financial year, the strikeoff occurs in the financial year in which all conditions have been satisfied... so there is no striking off after the financial year end... you file one last set of reports with ACRA.
I guess there is a market for pretty much everything these days. The major problem with selling SG company is that it requires nominee director. More and more local companies are not willing to provide this kind of service. I am dealing with one of the bigger local "specialist" for corporate matters and despite my 5 year relationship with them, every time I ask them to provide me something with, they are treating me like a stranger. Potential customer of SG company is not guaranteed that his new business profile and KYC will meet "specialist" approval for the appointment of nominee. In my opinion SG company makes sense only for residents or those who intend to be residents, otherwise HK is better despite audit requirements.Max Headroom wrote: [...]
You could also put the company up for sale.There is a market for this.
[...]
I note your problem. PM me if you need some help.stiwi wrote:I guess there is a market for pretty much everything these days. The major problem with selling SG company is that it requires nominee director. More and more local companies are not willing to provide this kind of service. I am dealing with one of the bigger local "specialist" for corporate matters and despite my 5 year relationship with them, every time I ask them to provide me something with, they are treating me like a stranger. Potential customer of SG company is not guaranteed that his new business profile and KYC will meet "specialist" approval for the appointment of nominee. In my opinion SG company makes sense only for residents or those who intend to be residents, otherwise HK is better despite audit requirements.Max Headroom wrote: [...]
You could also put the company up for sale.There is a market for this.
[...]
Be cautious of first time posters who say "PM me if you need some help". This normally means it is someone fishing for business, and we much prefer that "help" be published on this board so that all can benefit.bizrecovery wrote:I note your problem. PM me if you need some help.stiwi wrote:I guess there is a market for pretty much everything these days. The major problem with selling SG company is that it requires nominee director. More and more local companies are not willing to provide this kind of service. I am dealing with one of the bigger local "specialist" for corporate matters and despite my 5 year relationship with them, every time I ask them to provide me something with, they are treating me like a stranger. Potential customer of SG company is not guaranteed that his new business profile and KYC will meet "specialist" approval for the appointment of nominee. In my opinion SG company makes sense only for residents or those who intend to be residents, otherwise HK is better despite audit requirements.Max Headroom wrote: [...]
You could also put the company up for sale.There is a market for this.
[...]
Because it takes about 15 minutes to set up a new company, and generally you will have no idea how many people were pissed off by the "tried and true" company.Max Headroom wrote:The purpose I had in mind is, say, for someone keen to do business in the region. What better way than to buy a tried and true Pte Ltd? Beats having to start with a brand spanking new company with no track record at all.
A send-off like "Founded in 1998" indicates that the biz is pretty consolidated and has earned a few stripes eh. Once finances check out, away you go.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest