For example ?DimWit Kid wrote:Not saying that I disagree with you on my stance about Israel/Palestinian issue - quite the opposite. But this line of argument is just not right. There are many people who are not Jews have the same expectation that you write there. So it's not a valid argument to say that just because a group of people have the same expectation, it proves that they are a nation that comes from Jerusalem.Shavit wrote:How come millions of people from all around the world
have the same bible, same anticipation to return to the same place on earth,
same hope to be in Jerusalem celebrating their holy days ?
To put this into another pespective - do you know who Nelson Mandela is? He is credited with uniting South Africa and bringing an end to apartheid. You may even have taken part in the world wide rallies to "FREE MANDELA". Do you know why he was kept imprisoned despite world pressure to free him? It was because he REFUSED to renounce violence as a means of achieving his objective, yet the world hails him as a hero. He was instrumental in starting up MK (the military wing of the ANC) that was responsible for a number of violent attacks. Growing up in white SA in the 80's I remember having my bag searched every time I went into a shopping centre (sometimes there were even metal detectors) and seeing stories on the news about people killed in bomb blasts - I was too young to realise the risk to me. Violence was the only way that Mandela - a person who has been hailed as one of the greatest statesmen of all time - saw to gaining enough attention to end the attrocities that were being perpertrated against black people. They were backed in a corner and had nowhere else to go.terrie35 wrote: The Palestian rocket attacks on Israel have been going on for years - which country would want to tolerate such attacks on their citizens?
The Palestians have themselves to blame - Israel left them to self-rule but they let Hamas take over, and put the blame on Israel - how unfair is that ? To them Hamas is right, Israel is wrong - Hamas can throw rockets but Israel cannot - where is the logic ?
I guess this is one interpretation, and if you grew up in South Africa, this is what was surely explained to you. Outside of SA, the story is a little different, but in an important way. Mandela refused to be released because he wouldn't deny the right to be armed. I can't believe the Nobel Peace Prize nominating committee got it so wrong.carteki wrote: do you know who Nelson Mandela is? Violence was the only way that Mandela - a person who has been hailed as one of the greatest statesmen of all time - saw to gaining enough attention to end the attrocities that were being perpertrated against black people. They were backed in a corner and had nowhere else to go.
Well, that's the funny thing these days -- everybody knows what the outline of the only possible solution is, nobody is just publicly willing to commit to agreeing to it.DimWit Kid wrote:So to go back to the initial question - what should they do now?
Perhaps you could characterize them as "threatening" however. Though I do not know enough Indonesians or Malaysians to have a sense of the situation, I'm sure the surrounding countries are somewhat jealous of the wealth of Singapore.DimWit Kid wrote:I thought so (about tongue and the cheek) but nevertheless I was wondering if you meant it. Anyway, if you see my posts - I did say it make sense for Singapore to have an armed forces. What I don't agree is that Singapore is surrounded by hostile neighbors. Despite all the rhetorics, I don't think any of those could be categorized as "hostile".
Finally - yeah let's go back to Gaza topic
Not really.scarbowl wrote: Singapore has to maintain the appearance of a strong defense to discourage its neighbors from thinking too much about the prosperity here and how they might extract a "tax" for themselves.
I don't know, you could argue it was founded by the Allied forces in the aftermath of WW2. I mean the Jewish exodus of refugees from central Europe could hardly stay put and get annihilated by the Nazis. You could argue that Israel exists because of the Germans...aster wrote:Don't want to spoil anyone's party, but Israel itself was founded by terrorists, who resorted to planting bombs and butchering innocent people.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests