Just the opposite, I'd say. A point-and-shoot contains all sorts of fancy logic that second-guesses what you're trying to do and adjusts accordingly. An SLR, on the other hand, does exactly what you tell it to do. When I first got my SLR, I remember being shocked by how dark and dull the pictures were... until I realized that the default settings just take and store the picture with no adjustments at all, while my previous P&S automatically tweaked the dynamic range, brightness etc to make the picture "pop", and with a few mouse strokes in Photoshop/Gimp I could do the same (or something entirely different!) to the SLR pictures.AngryAngMo wrote:Always keep in mind, that buying a SLR doesnt automatically mean better quality in your pictures.
Let's just get one thing straight here: a SLR ("single-lens reflex") camera means that both the viewfinder and the film (digital or otherwise) see the same thing through one lens ("single lens"), and that a little mirror flips ("reflex") from the viewfinder to the film when you press the shutter. A camera is either built like this, in which case it's an SLR, or it doesn't, in which case it's not. Period.pixfirewall wrote:just get the Panasonic Lumix LX-3...Point and shoot compact camera with DSLR capability and control...of course its SLR quality pics since its using Leica Lens..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests