Well well W.I.M.H. aren't you the wordy one !Wind In My Hair wrote:Ode To Sugar (dedicated to sweet Ozchick)
Oh Sugar, nothing comes close
To your special way of putting on
Pounds of fat with just one dose
You call yourself glucose and sucrose
And hide behind such pretty names
Well, you can go fructose
Get away from in front of my nose
You and your sneaky little ways
Make me obese to my toes
Oh Sugar, you bring on such woes
Trying to understand you
Makes poor Ozchick comatose
Yeah well THIS is clearly the reason why I can't be comfortable with any ingredient that says Glucose yeah ? There's usually no derivative written next to 'glucose' on packaged products. Thanks for this Strong Eagle. 'I'm not at all happy with this but at least I understand the issue now and will search for products which DO list the derivative for the glucose ingredient.Strong Eagle wrote:Glucose is commonly referred to as "blood sugar" because is the major form of sugar/monosaccharide found in the body.
The chemical composition of glucose is C6H12O6. Like the sugar (sucrose - C12H22O11) you eat, it really doesn't matter where it came from... if it has this formula there is nothing but glucose or sucrose... the source is indistinguishable... could be corn, sugar beets, sugar cane... but you could not tell where it came from.
No, glucose isn't the problem. The problem is 'corn' which is often used to make the glucose. Glucose made from anything other than corn is fine. The rooster reckons that glucose made from corn should be fine in its 'broken'down molecular state..mm...I don't know about this but am gonna contact the allergy dudes for a lowdown on whether corn in glucose is a problem Gee if I didn't have to think about glucose and its ingredients I could eat a whole lot more interesting stuff.Splatted wrote:I don't think you're allergic to glucose. You simply can't live if this is the case, as the body makes this sugar when it digests (or rather metabolises) everything, including proteins in even fats (in certain fasting states).
Could it be "glutens" you're allergic to instead? It sounds like glucose .. kinda..
Glucose is glucose is glucose, it doesn't matter what it's made from. It's like vodka: you can make it from potatoes or wheat or virtually anything, but at the end of the day, only alcohol and water are left.ozchick wrote:No, glucose isn't the problem. The problem is 'corn' which is often used to make the glucose. Glucose made from anything other than corn is fine.
This is quite true. However -- and ozchick, correct me if I'm wrong -- your allergy is not like a peanut allergy, where one whiff of peanut swells your head up into a basketball and you need to be rushed to the ER. Instead, if your "allergy" just means getting an upset stomach from eating corn-based foods, then the minute amounts of corn residue left in industrial glucose are way too small to have any impact, and you can quite safely ignore them.taxico wrote:there will be corn protein (residual) left in the finished product, so there's no way to tell unless it's specifically written CORN FREE. this isn't happening anytime soon.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests