banana wrote:you realise how drawn out conversations will be if that happens?
"how was your weekend?"
"ok lah, went for supper with Bob"
"pigment challenged Bob?"
"yeah, he is so localised...the fellow of ethnic origins from the Indian subcontinent running the hawker stall actually knows him by name!"

cant use colour either!!!Vaucluse wrote:banana wrote:you realise how drawn out conversations will be if that happens?
"how was your weekend?"
"ok lah, went for supper with Bob"
"pigment challenged Bob?"
"yeah, he is so localised...the fellow of ethnic origins from the Indian subcontinent running the hawker stall actually knows him by name!"How silly it will be if the PC-ness of the population reaches that stage.
Don't worry EF, with the last few months anti China demonstrations and even physical abuse of the Olympic torch carriers in mind, I am afraid not many foreigners will visit the Beijing Olympics anyway.earthfriendly wrote:I wonder how welcome it makes their guests feel.
Good, the fewer the better = less money in the despot's koffers.Superglide wrote:Don't worry EF, with the last few months anti China demonstrations and even physical abuse of the Olympic torch carriers in mind, I am afraid not many foreigners will visit the Beijing Olympics anyway.earthfriendly wrote:I wonder how welcome it makes their guests feel.
I usually dislike hearing it directed at me unless in shared jest and from someone I know. Even then I find it borderline rude - I don't like nor understand the need to declare such obvious differences. It immediately dumbs down the conversation, and always struck me as being very provincial.earthfriendly wrote:I would not equate "Ang Moh" to "Chink". Latter is meant to be derogatory while former is not. They are not equivalent. "Chinese" is the proper tem in common usage for "Chink" whereas "Angmoh" is the accepted term for "Angmoh".... It is definitely not negative term.
You should - where I come from it's on par with "Wop", "Spic", "Jap" and the N-word. Most people would never say these to someone's face, only hushed out of ear-shot or as the last words before fists fly.earthfriendly wrote:Although I myself do not find the term "Chink" offensive. It has a nice "ring" sound to it.
I beg to differ with you. "Angmoh" is not the accepted term for "Angmoh" is a "not" accepted term for "White Man" or "Westerner" or 'Caucasian". Any of which was be acceptable. Angmoh is not. Why is not okay to use the word "Chink"? How do you know if it is being used derogatorily? When using the word to refer to somebody (in their presence) and you don't use their given name but use the term Angmoh, it is a slur or insult.earthfriendly wrote: I would not equate "Ang Moh" to "Chink". Latter is meant to be derogatory while former is not. They are not equivalent. "Chinese" is the proper tem in common usage for "Chink" whereas "Angmoh" is the accepted term for "Angmoh".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests