mate, you're not wrong. There is no middle ground for the intent of the words. There is, however, a grey area in the circumstances of their use.EADG wrote:brother, I've always found myself in agreement with about 99% of what you post, and what you described is the conundrum
agree with the caveat that these are the only ways those words can be used - with well-placed irony between trusted friends where everyone is hip to the humor, or, when being intentionally and antagonistically racist in the ugliest way possiblebanana wrote: I have no problems with being called Chink by pretty much anyone (unless they were obviously being malicious and racist)...Hell sometimes I call white people nigga. It's meant to be ironic.
there is no middle ground for words like these
Often, you just know when a person is on the same wavelength and you're gonna be great friends. Sometimes though, the signal can be fuzzy and the only way to know is to test the waters.
Intentional racism aside, the second situation is probably where the most offense occurs. Of course it doesn't help when there are people who think they have a right to intervene when it isn't relevant to their person, thus adding fuel to fire. Or when the idea isn't thought through and the person testing the waters decides there is no need to explain nor apologise. People everywhere are guilty of this, not just Singaporeans saying "angmoh" or "Jap" or Westerners saying "Chink". The initial intention was good, they were just trying to build rapport. But somehow, the concept of personal responsibility got lost along the way.
This seems appropriate:

