Race is here basically equal to the appearance. Also from biological perspective it seems likely (I am not an anthropopsychologist..eee whatever) we have some built-in preconditions finding our own race to be visually more attractive. In general I find Caucasian women to be more attractive and there is not a single molecule of racism in it. Just my personal preferences. It would be one if I find an Asian women more or equally attractive but because she is an Asian I would prefer somebody else. You are thinking in terms of labels. Think in terms of properties. Personality, intelligence, skin color, body structure etc, these are the properties to be matched to the personal preferences.badgerxbutt wrote:other, normal men find me attractive without having any inclination towards my race. It shouldn't be a factor when choosing a potential partner.
So how about gender equality in dating?badgerxbutt wrote:Perhaps you do not see it as any worse and I have no doubts that there are others that don't either, but some do not appreciate attention or "attraction" that is driven by racial preference. Just as you think that's OK, there are people (like myself) who do not.Addadude wrote: Surely people should be allowed to indulge their personal preference when it comes to romance? Some people prefer blondes. Some people like brunettes. Some women prefer tall men. So, is being an "Asiaphile" really any worse then preferring to date blondes?
I personally, just find it creepy. I've encountered a handful of them living in Britain, and they make me feel physically sick. I just don't understand the mentality - other, normal men find me attractive without having any inclination towards my race. It shouldn't be a factor when choosing a potential partner.
I think that it's racism. I would never date someone who was incapable of finding women of other races attractive. I would want to know why they would choose not to date them, because the reasons could only be generalisations/stereotyping. How can you honestly say you would eliminate an entire race (or several races) of people from your dating preferences? That is millions of people, with varying levels of personal attractiveness, a variety of personalities and smarts. That is what people are generally attracted to, not skin colour.
If it were a person being racially selective about his/her friendship group, they would be a racist. How is this any different?
*four thumbs up*ozchick wrote:Genetically, the progeny of mixed races should prove to be a valuable addition to the world's population. And one could mention the addition of further racial tolerance that may go hand in hand with the whole idea. Great to read of these personal examples of how well it can work !
"From little acorns, big oak trees grow"
I'm not a muslim but I hope I'm allowed to answer this based on my discussions with muslims, what I have read from the quran and legal websites.Momofthree wrote:And a side note it was my understanding that only Muslim women have to marry a Muslim man but that Muslim men could marry Jewish, Christian or Muslim women. Can any Muslims on board let me know if I am wrong on that one?
If you're taking the leap of marrying cross-religion (one side being Islam), I'd suggest you probably don't really care a great deal about whether it is recognised in 'the' religion, or 'answering to god in the hereafter'.waz wrote:Hi Leona.
As far as civil marriage, there is no such thing in Islam. You can still marry civil but it will never be recognise in the religion. Technically, it is like saying that you can get away with it now but you have to answer to God in the hereafter. Civil marriage without religious solemnisation is as good as not married in the eye of the religion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests