Singapore Expats

Growing a Pair: The De-Feminization of Men!

Chats, Flames, Jokes, Junks. Don't know where to post ? You've just found the right place.
Post Reply
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 9:13 am

Growing a Pair: The De-Feminization of Men!

Post by Jeppo » Fri, 22 Feb 2008 8:44 am

By: William Wong, ND, PhD, Member World Sports Medicine Hall of Fame.

How can women today stand it!!! To have men as delicate and fretful
and argumentative as the most estrogen dominant female must drive them
nuts! Most women marry men to be their men, not to be their girl
friend, mother or worst still their mother in law! From the 1970's
onward we've had the age of the wimp! Testosterone was condemned by
the "Libber FemaNazis" as the root of all evil; male images on TV and
in the movies went from being builders, being wise, guiding and
understanding to being dupes, stupid and unable to do a thing unless
guided by their ever so wise womenfolk!

Combine this brainwashing with the 5 to 8 birth control pills worth of
estrogen in each bottle of soy formula fed to baby boys at a time when
their testosterone level should be equal to that of an 18 year old so
that the particular part of the anterior pituitary develops telling
the boy he is a Guy, a Male, a future Man and you see that we've had a
multi-level assault on manhood worldwide in the latter part of the
20th century and that we are feeling the effects of it now with the
huge numbers of unproductive, weak willed, "sensitive", unreliable,
soft men. Men so childlike they still cling to playing with the round
bouncy objects that are the earmarks of childhood (rubber balls).
Worst still they revel in watching other fully grown men play with the
instruments of childhood! The more mature of them watch sports other
than those involving round bouncy things. But if watch more than they
do, they are spectators in life and not participants!

Not only have their psyches gone soft, but due to the estrogen they've
eaten and continue to eat their penises are smaller and softer when
"hard" than previous generations. Also, their sperm counts are though
the floor with men today being only marginally fertile at an average
of 20,000 sperm per Ml of ejaculate instead of the 100,000 sperm per
ml men normally made in the 1960s. Dr. Doris Rapp MD, the worlds
leading pediatric allergist has research to show that at this rate
only 21% of the men in the world will be even marginally fertile by
2045!!! (Gals if you want to get pregnant find yourselves a guy born
before the introduction of soy formula in 1973! He'll have more sperm
and a bigger "you know what" than your high maintenance, high emotion,
high strung boy toy)!

In a reversal of a study done in the 1970's or 80's, English women
today are looking for men with strong sturdy hands. It used to be that
these gals went for men with delicate hands, since those hands also
denote a delicate nature. Now, in the Millennium, English gals have
grown tired of the "sensitivity" and lack of dependability these men
possess and they are looking for men who can actually work, do things
and build things. For a gal to feather her nest, some guy actually
needs to be able to build the nest and protect it. The larger,
thicker, stronger hand denotes someone who might actually be able to
do those things!

The last time the earth had this many girly men around was at the end
of the Western Roman Empire. That's the main reason why the Western
Empire fell to the robust and manly barbarians!

So, how do we reverse the trend? How do we fix the soft broken men of
the X and Y generations and prevent the womanization of men from
happening in the future?

First: is to tell the media to stop showing men and fathers as
incompetent fools. We do this by denying Hollyweird the dollars they
get when watching their movies and deluging TV advertisers with angry
letters when they sponsor a TV show featuring the soft wimp as their
typical male.

Second: we demand a return to the male hero image that so passionately
showed boys that strong men are both kind, giving as well as
protective, building and strong. The sadistic misogynist now portrayed
as a "Strong man" by the Hip Hop generation is actually an
overcompensating weakling blindly striking out at what he thinks is
holding him down. Hopalong Cassidy and John Wayne are the images the
strong kind men of the 40's through the 60's knew. Compare their quiet
stoic strength with the whining weakness of today's men! Compare their
getting up and doing for themselves with the weakness of having to
have things done for them.

Since the industrial revolution not a single generation of men has
been inducted into manhood! It used to be that a boy went to the
fields to work with his father, spent most of the non-school day with
him and his father taught him the skills men needed, in that day, to
be men. Tradition has it that men go from being taught by their
fathers to being mentored further in life, their professions, trades
or spirituality by another older male.

Today we have no such teaching. Since men went to work in factories
and then offices, boys did not have their fathers around to learn from
or emulate. All they see of their dads is the tired, angry man wanting
to be left alone after a day spent making someone else rich. Without
images of what men were supposed to be like, boys in the late 1800's
turned to the heroes of classic literature for their example of how to
be. From the 1920's onward they turned to the movies to see images of
strong men heroes etc. Somewhere in the anti-hero days of the 60's,
the images of strong good men began to decline, and with that the
behavior of boys began to decline to match. We need to reverse the
image and stop the decline.

Third: Mothers need to stop babying their boys. The most costly
example of how weak men can bring ruin to a people happened in the
Holocaust. Historical research tells us that the Nazis had a total of
only some 120,000 police and soldiers rounding up the over six million
Jews who were put into the death camps. If we work on the simple math
that one third of those 6+ million were grown men then that meant that
there were 2 million men at hand to resist the 120,000 oppressors.
Even given the fact that the Nazis had disarmed civilians in Europe,
what percentage of 2 million is 120 thousand? Not much.

Jewish men in most of Europe (Poland being the notable exceptions)
were de-balled, raised to be anything but strong. After the Captain
Dryfus affair in France, not many of them ever wanted to be soldiers.
One rabbi told me that European Jewish mothers who kept their sons
spoiled, soft and their husbands henpecked on purpose could often be
heard repeatedly saying: "I didn't raise my son to be a solider". When
the oppressors came only a hand- full of Jewish men in Poland stood up
to fight and when they did the Nazis recoiled in horror. It took 3
regiments of troops to put down a rebellion by less than 30 determined
Jews. What percentage is less than 30 out of 2 million?!

The Jews who got to Israel assimilated and applied their lesson.
Compare the nebbish Jewish men of 1930's Europe to the Sabra, the
Israeli born Jews who though outnumbered 13 to 1, soundly kicked Arab
ass three times in their 1st generation!!! The Sabra were as different
from the European Jews as Joshua's Sinai raised warriors were
different from their parents who had been Egyptian slaves! Their
mothers stopped raising soft boys! All of their sons became soldiers!
(One of the reasons I strongly believe in universal conscription and
national service ala the Swiss and Israeli's is to make men strong and
responsible citizens. National service protects the nation, and gives
needed training and strength to mind and body. Since the Industrial
Revolution separated boys from their fathers and elder men, it is the
new rite of passage for boys to become men. No person should have a
say in their society unless they are willing to put their asses on the
line for that society).

Here in the States, Rabbi Mayer Kahana tried to reverse the softness
he saw in American Jewish boys when his Jewish Defense League held
summer training camps teaching boys martial arts, shooting skills and
just teaching them to stand up for themselves! "Never Again" was his
cry! The resistance he got from his own "nebbish" here, calling him a
hate monger, made him move to Israel where they understood that Jews
needed to be strong men or they all would perish.

Lesson #1: Mindset and self image makes a difference, for good or bad
to the individual and a nation.

As our minds work so we are. Brain changes have been noted in animal
species given soy: most notable was the collapse of the rabbit
industry in New Zealand. The industry changed to soy feed en mass only
to have the entire industry collapse. The rabbits did not reproduce
and were asexual! So, to help on the hormonal side, we need to stop
the use of soy formula. Never feed soy, flax, black beans or any other
highly estrogenic food to boys or men. We need to weed out every
estrogenic thing our foods are laced with not only to lower the
fibrosis, inflammations and cancers the estrogen is causing but to
change the way the mind wants to work when under the influence of

You Cuban relatives of mine - stop eating black beans. It is any
wonder you men look like your worn out fathers by 40 and the gals age
so by 35! Being so estrogen dominant in eating black beans almost
daily, was it any wonder Cuba did not throw off the tyrannical Spanish
rule until nearly 70 years after the rest of Latin America did; and
even at that Cuba needed help from abroad? Being estrogen dominant as
the Cuban people still are, is it any wonder no one's found the balls
to kick out a Stalinist dictator whose firing squads have killed
millions of their own in the last 50 years!

Lesson #2: Estrogen dominance makes a difference, for the worst, to an
individual and to a nation!

The combination of feeding our kids and eating right; the presentation
of strong, kind and intelligent men as figures to imitate; taking away
the implements of childhood and giving boys the implements of manhood;
and the training needed to keep their bodies strong, their minds
filled with high principles and their spirits filled with God, can and
will turn the wimp men of this age into the last of their kind seen
for many a century.

Testosterone dominant men will immediately recognize implications or
the facts here and see the soft men around them as liabilities once
they become aware of the facts. Estrogen dominant men will ignore the
principles, downplay the history and as all bitchy women do, pick at
the nits and whine to keep from having to grow a pair of what they
should have had in the first place had not Enfamil, their mothers and
Hilary's village gotten in the way.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Last post

Return to “Leisure Chat, Jokes, Rubbish”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests