abt the 6 mths ban...

pacficgal · Post by **pacficgal** » Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:53 am

hi everybody..

i'm new here.. i've got a qns.. if i tried for july 15th walk-in interview.. n was booted out at the mgt round.. do i reali have to wait for 6mths b4 i can start tryin again? cuz i koe on aug 25 & 26 there's another recruitment.. can anyone advise? thanks

VeniE · Post by **VeniE** » Sun, 05 Aug 2007 1:44 am

pacficgal wrote:hi everybody..

i'm new here.. i've got a qns.. if i tried for july 15th walk-in interview.. n was booted out at the mgt round.. do i reali have to wait for 6mths b4 i can start tryin again? cuz i koe on aug 25 & 26 there's another recruitment.. can anyone advise? thanks

hi dear... i afraid that u have to wait for 6 months lo.. coz they have record de... even if u tried again and manage to get into mgmt round i think they wont let u in de lo... it happens to my friend b4...

pacficgal · Post by **pacficgal** » Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:07 am

ok thanks dear.. well guess i have to wait den..

6mths its reali long.. sigh.. thanks for your advice.. its gona be tough but i wun give up! thanks

VeniE · Post by **VeniE** » Sun, 05 Aug 2007 11:21 am

yeah.. dun give up yea... me too... though i tried many times but i never give up... keke... jia you... keke...

rurik0 · Post by **rurik0** » Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:20 pm

hi pacfic gal,
i'm in the same situation as you... so i know how u feel... haha, we've just gotta wait man! anyway, anyone knows why there is such a ban?

pacficgal · Post by **pacficgal** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:54 am

puzzled though... hmm i tink rurik0 mayb u were the same grp who went wif me to the wc at stc..

argh.. btw will u ppl try other airlines?

Plavt · Post by **Plavt** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 1:00 am

rurik0 wrote:hi pacfic gal,
why there is such a ban?

It is not a ban but a deferment, if they didn't have it people who are unsuitable and always will be would come back and simply lumber them with unnecessary work.

pacficgal · Post by **pacficgal** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 1:09 am

ok.. hmm but isn't 6mths too long.. its a torture for ppl who reali wans to join sia..

Plavt · Post by **Plavt** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 3:06 am

pacficgal wrote:ok.. hmm but isn't 6mths too long.. its a torture for ppl who reali wans to join sia..

No, there are candidates who are suitable from the first interview. Why should the airline waste it's time re-interviewing people who may not be suitable after several attempts? A question of simple economics, deferment means an applicant should have a good look at themselves and prepare for the next time around.

starie · Post by **starie** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 3:17 pm

Plavt wrote:
rurik0 wrote:hi pacfic gal,
why there is such a ban?
It is not a ban but a deferment, if they didn't have it people who are unsuitable and always will be would come back and simply lumber them with unnecessary work.

but this lady in charge said that its something that we've said wrong.. if they really think that we're bad, they will tell us what went wrong..
so how come we cant be given a chance to try all over again?

VeniE · Post by **VeniE** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 3:20 pm

I think those who fail at mgmt round, they don't want to see the similar people so fast...

i think that's beacuse they wanna give chances to people who have not been to mgmt round before...

so it's fair for all ba... well i dun know.. even you question them, i doubt they will answer ur qns

rurik0 · Post by **rurik0** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 3:41 pm

i asked my fren bout the 6months thingy and she told me many companies are like that. The reason they have 6months is because they wan the pp to forget you....and especially what you said. Coz if we get to mgmt round again and get put up w/ the same interviewers, they will surely rmber us. At the same time, the 6months is for us to improve ourselves....

Plavt · Post by **Plavt** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 3:50 pm

starie wrote:
but this lady in charge said that its something that we've said wrong.. if they really think that we're bad, they will tell us what went wrong..
so how come we cant be given a chance to try all over again?

Wakey wakey starie! Not a case of thinking you are bad; what she meant was your answers are not what they are looking for and you are getting a chance to try again the stipulation being in six months time.

Plavt · Post by **Plavt** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 3:53 pm

rurik0 wrote:i asked my fren bout the 6months thingy and she told me many companies are like that. The reason they have 6months is because they wan the pp to forget you....

The last company I worked for, I had two attempts before being accepted; the interviewer remembered only too well. Personally I think it is more a case of the applicant getting his or her act together (i.e. look at yourself and see where you went wrong and consider whether or not you really are suitable).

rurik0 · Post by **rurik0** » Mon, 06 Aug 2007 9:02 pm

what starie meant was , if we had really done/said something bad, they would have told us. However, ours wasn't that bad datz why they did not tell us wad is it we said/done wrong...

Plavt wrote:
starie wrote:
but this lady in charge said that its something that we've said wrong.. if they really think that we're bad, they will tell us what went wrong..
so how come we cant be given a chance to try all over again?
Wakey wakey starie! Not a case of thinking you are bad; what she meant was your answers are not what they are looking for and you are getting a chance to try again the stipulation being in six months time.

SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore

abt the 6 mths ban...

abt the 6 mths ban...

Re: abt the 6 mths ban...

Who is online