It looks like Blu-ray will take the lead according to Matsushita, otherwise known as Panasonic, with blu-ray being more competitive.Splatted wrote:I wouldn't be buying anything Blue-ray for a while till the dust settles which format the movie industries will be fully backing.
As you may be aware, both Blue-Ray & HD DVD security have been broken, and you now see HD movies available for download through the torrent networks.
What is happening now, some of the movie studios are delaying the release of new movie titles in this format, until they are confident the format is safe.
I would hate to invest in one format, only to find you can't buy movies down the track.
On the other hand, if it's for just plain old data-storage you want the drives, I would strongly recommend sticking with just plain old DVD format. HD DVD/Blue ray disks are much more sensitive to scratches, and are very expensive.
I've read of people getting the tiniest of scratches on their King Kong disk, only to have to return it to the store for a replacement.
What's the low-down on Blu-ray DVD's over in Singapore. If I buy a stand alone Blu-Ray DVD player in the USA will it work over in Singapore?
Singapore disks (if you can find a store that sells them here) would work on a player from the USA, as far as I'm aware. From what I've heard, there's no region-coding in this format.
Where you will need to be careful are voltage differences between USA & Singapore. USA, if I'm not mistaken work at 110V, while Singapore, I believe is 230V.
It may have the capacity, but it's not the most safest way of backing up data, nor the cheapest.Teema wrote:Personally I'm hoping for the Blu-ray camp. The capacity advantage IS significant, especially on a computer: 30gb for a dual layer HD-DVD, 50gb for a dual layer Blu-ray. Possibility of backing up my entire photo album on a disc is neat.
Blu-ray disc is also more scratch-resistant than HD-DVD. And the much bigger storage jump is worthy of a generation update. HD-DVDs only offers 3 times the capacity of DVDs. I hope they die soon
A 320GB hard disc costs around $60-90 (USD) (internal HD, the cheapest kind).Splatted wrote: It may have the capacity, but it's not the most safest way of backing up data, nor the cheapest.
on a per GB comparison, it's much cheaper buying a second hard disk for backup. Prices have plummeted! Statistically, much less read/write errors as well.
Just to further elaborate on this, wikipaedia has the following info:Dobski wrote:Hi Yutenji, I have a PS3 that I bought in Singapore.
In answer to your questions:-
A) - I can play Blu Ray films I bought from Amazon.com (america) and HMV on Orchard Road in Singapore.
B) - I CANNOT play DVD's from any region.
(my home cinema system is region free for DVD playback)
PS3 games are not region coded.
PS1 and PS2 games on the PS3(the ones that are backwards compatible) are region coded
Agreed, however the same argument was put forward for DVD9 format and at the time HD's were still cheaper.Teema wrote: We would need around 6 (50x6=300) dual layer Blu-ray discs to match the capacity.
If blank Blu-ray can match $10 or less, it beats the hard drive. That price point should be very easily reachable once the format reaches mass-adoption.
I was reading just now on another forum which drew attention to the latest release titles of movies, and the differences between the high definition formats.ksl wrote: It looks like Blu-ray will take the lead according to Matsushita, otherwise known as Panasonic, with blu-ray being more competitive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests