NEXT SIA RECRUITMENT: 21st-22nd APRIL =)

12345 · Post by **12345** » Wed, 09 May 2007 7:17 pm

chermainrae wrote:i noe that tis is a repeat of wat i've said earlier..

but does anyone noes what's the main reason y we would have to wait 6 mths if we get kicked out during management?

and if we do not abide by this rule, will we be penalise?

Well, the reason the HR personnel gave was just that the management would not like to see the same applicant being interviewed so often. That's because they are very senior management ppl...hence i think they would rather give u 6 months and then see the improvements.

I've read from the other threads that the interviewer would kinda reject the applicant at the 2nd round if the 6 months ban is not fulfilled. Applicant mite get thru the 1st round...but unlikely at the 1-1 interview.

xiangzhou_1984 · Post by **xiangzhou_1984** » Wed, 09 May 2007 8:39 pm

Plavot wrote:Of cos there is a relation.

When the recruiters get their bonus, they will feel more motivated to hire stewards. This is because more stewards hired means more bonus.

And as a result, when there is more bonus, it attracts more people wanting to become stewards which results in the recruiters being able to recruit more stewards and thus getting a higher bonus both for themselves as well as the new stewards being hired.

When the bonus is low, the recruiters will not hire that many stewards due to not many people wanting to become stewards at that particular point of time. This will indirectly affect their bonus and result in a lower bonus both for them as well as the existing stewards. However, this will lead to a temporary shortage of stewards and thus gives a chance for the recruiters to recruite more stewards which will then increase their bonus indirectly. When their bonus is increased, the recruiters will be more motivated to hire more stewards which will result in an increase in their bonus.

I'm sorry, may I ask where did you get your information from? You sound very confident in your answer. But it is baseless and inaccurate. Recruiters are often staff from HR and cabin crew department. They are not required to hire more people to get bonuses. The bonus is decided upon the performance of the company. Pls do get your facts right.

jencrs · Post by **jencrs** » Wed, 09 May 2007 10:49 pm

buzzzybeebee wrote:
Plavot wrote:Of cos there is a relation.

When the recruiters get their bonus, they will feel more motivated to hire stewards. This is because more stewards hired means more bonus.

And as a result, when there is more bonus, it attracts more people wanting to become stewards which results in the recruiters being able to recruit more stewards and thus getting a higher bonus both for themselves as well as the new stewards being hired.

When the bonus is low, the recruiters will not hire that many stewards due to not many people wanting to become stewards at that particular point of time. This will indirectly affect their bonus and result in a lower bonus both for them as well as the existing stewards. However, this will lead to a temporary shortage of stewards and thus gives a chance for the recruiters to recruite more stewards which will then increase their bonus indirectly. When their bonus is increased, the recruiters will be more motivated to hire more stewards which will result in an increase in their bonus.
Wah............ Still very confusing... hahaha!!

Here's what he means:

1) Recruiters are motivated through bonuses.

2) This motivation is channelled into hiring more stewards (and very possibly, stewardesses).

3) The size of your bonus and the number of stewards hired are directly corelated i.e. the more hired, the fatter your bonus.

4) Even when the bonus is low, there is greater opportunity to hired more stewards, thus driving the bonus up - again.

5) Rinse and repeat.

Understand? Neither do I.

jas_ps · Post by **jas_ps** » Wed, 09 May 2007 11:32 pm

If hire more stewards can increase recruiters' bonus, they will take everyone who attend the interview...

joyfulpapaya · Post by **joyfulpapaya** » Thu, 10 May 2007 12:33 am

Ah...tks for the reply.

i think more bonus=more stewards hired dun mean the hr ppl get commission...just tt they're happy..so more motivated to work...? in any case... hope my dearie gets in!!!

ntyj · Post by **ntyj** » Fri, 11 May 2007 2:00 am

chermainrae wrote:i noe that tis is a repeat of wat i've said earlier..

but does anyone noes what's the main reason y we would have to wait 6 mths if we get kicked out during management?

and if we do not abide by this rule, will we be penalise?

i think its jus a guideline to not deprive others of a chance...?
there is a definite reason why one is not chosen during the final rd...somewhere must be wrong...

so they would prefer one to wait for abt 6 mths later..and let others have a chance bah? =p

chermainrae · Post by **chermainrae** » Fri, 11 May 2007 11:54 am

okie thanks ntyj and 12345 for the reply... i guess i'll have to think through n see if i wan to risk gettin kicked out again due to not fufilling the 6 mth ban...

frankly, it's really a very nerve racking experience especially when u r waitin for them to announce the results...

think i would jus have to wait till oct or so to try again...

autumn-reverie · Post by **autumn-reverie** » Fri, 11 May 2007 10:39 pm

chermainrae wrote:okie thanks ntyj and 12345 for the reply... i guess i'll have to think through n see if i wan to risk gettin kicked out again due to not fufilling the 6 mth ban...

frankly, it's really a very nerve racking experience especially when u r waitin for them to announce the results...

think i would jus have to wait till oct or so to try again...

Hey chermainrae,
don't be discouraged. The fact that you made it so far attests that you're SQ girl material. really hope to see you try again

jencrs · Post by **jencrs** » Mon, 14 May 2007 5:22 am

jencrs wrote:
theknees wrote:
M wrote: The one I quoted is taking place in SIN. And positions for FS should be opened since bonus is around the corner.
i heard this year's bonus is a good one.
Not really. Anyway, don't forget that the bonus is a function of your basic pay, so it's not going to add up to much.

Going to have to take this back. This year's bonus is pretty fat. Not sure how it's applied throughout the company though, with the different unions and agreements.

theknees · Post by **theknees** » Mon, 14 May 2007 3:04 pm

12345 wrote:
theknees wrote:
M wrote: The one I quoted is taking place in SIN. And positions for FS should be opened since bonus is around the corner.
i heard this year's bonus is a good one.
Sorry...but i was a bit blur regarding the bonus and recruitment for stewards. Any relation???

yes because most of the crew choose to resign after getting their bonuses. if they resign before, they lose out, so wait till after getting their bonus, then its byebye!

i'm a bit confused by Plavt's theory though.

theknees · Post by **theknees** » Mon, 14 May 2007 3:08 pm

jencrs wrote:
jencrs wrote:
theknees wrote: i heard this year's bonus is a good one.
Not really. Anyway, don't forget that the bonus is a function of your basic pay, so it's not going to add up to much.
Going to have to take this back. This year's bonus is pretty fat. Not sure how it's applied throughout the company though, with the different unions and agreements.

yea, not forgetting company profits!

i guess most cabin crew's bonus shld be pretty good. my dad and his girlfriend both said so.

Plavt · Post by **Plavt** » Mon, 14 May 2007 3:39 pm

theknees wrote: i'm a bit confused by Plavt's theory though.

Plavot's theory I'm Plavt.

12345 · Post by **12345** » Mon, 14 May 2007 4:00 pm

theknees wrote:
12345 wrote:
theknees wrote: i heard this year's bonus is a good one.
Sorry...but i was a bit blur regarding the bonus and recruitment for stewards. Any relation???
yes because most of the crew choose to resign after getting their bonuses. if they resign before, they lose out, so wait till after getting their bonus, then its byebye!

i'm a bit confused by Plavt's theory though.

Yupz, now i get the relation. Haha!

N i'm sure most of the crews are having a great time this yr...just look at SIA's latest profits. Shocking!!! So do trainees get bonuses as well?

jencrs · Post by **jencrs** » Mon, 14 May 2007 4:43 pm

12345 wrote:
theknees wrote:
12345 wrote: Sorry...but i was a bit blur regarding the bonus and recruitment for stewards. Any relation???
yes because most of the crew choose to resign after getting their bonuses. if they resign before, they lose out, so wait till after getting their bonus, then its byebye!

i'm a bit confused by Plavt's theory though.
Yupz, now i get the relation. Haha!

N i'm sure most of the crews are having a great time this yr...just look at SIA's latest profits. Shocking!!! So do trainees get bonuses as well?

Nope, just the AWS.

12345 · Post by **12345** » Wed, 16 May 2007 12:50 am

jencrs wrote:
12345 wrote:
theknees wrote: yes because most of the crew choose to resign after getting their bonuses. if they resign before, they lose out, so wait till after getting their bonus, then its byebye!

i'm a bit confused by Plavt's theory though.
Yupz, now i get the relation. Haha!

N i'm sure most of the crews are having a great time this yr...just look at SIA's latest profits. Shocking!!! So do trainees get bonuses as well?
Nope, just the AWS.

Sorry...but was does AWS stand for???

SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore

NEXT SIA RECRUITMENT: 21st-22nd APRIL =)

Who is online