I'm just curious how this would happen. There must be a co-ordinating body to calculate, redistribute, and keep account of the royalties, and that means some form of government, perhaps a local tribunal? Or would the oil companies undertake this project and why would they want to? And would everyone get an equal share?Strong Eagle wrote:I got to meet Steve Forbes today, Chairman of Forbes. At a talk he gave he suggested that one way to stop the interal conflict in Iraq is to distribute the oil royalties directly to the people instead of the central government holding all the royalties for "infrastructure rebuilding".
The idea is very good, and I'm sure the people of Iraq, would welcome it, although it would not stop, the power struggle, the money would probably go to fighting, for power. To be honest with you its my opinion, there is no solution to solving this problem.Strong Eagle wrote:I got to meet Steve Forbes today, Chairman of Forbes. At a talk he gave he suggested that one way to stop the interal conflict in Iraq is to distribute the oil royalties directly to the people instead of the central government holding all the royalties for "infrastructure rebuilding".
This would accomplish several things.
a) People would have an incentive to see more oil produced and not less because it would mean more money... simple naked self interest.
b) It would permit Iraq to be essentially divided into Kurds, Sunnis, and Shites because they would all share oil wealth which is mostly in the hands of the Kurds and Shites.
c) It would stop government corruption in handing out billions of dollars in contracts.
d) It would allow infrastructure to be built from the ground up because people with money start businesses and they want to improve their environment.
I think it is an intriguing idea and I've never seen it brought up before.
Good idea! Who is going to be responsible fo carrying it out? There is a deep rooted hatered amonst the sunnis, shiites and the kurds. They can't stand each others guts. How are they going to distribute these royalties in a fair or justifiable manner? The risk of corruption and bias creeping in are very high. Do you honestly believe that it is still possible to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure after what it has been through?Strong Eagle wrote:I got to meet Steve Forbes today, Chairman of Forbes. At a talk he gave he suggested that one way to stop the interal conflict in Iraq is to distribute the oil royalties directly to the people instead of the central government holding all the royalties for "infrastructure rebuilding".
This would accomplish several things.
a) People would have an incentive to see more oil produced and not less because it would mean more money... simple naked self interest.
b) It would permit Iraq to be essentially divided into Kurds, Sunnis, and Shites because they would all share oil wealth which is mostly in the hands of the Kurds and Shites.
c) It would stop government corruption in handing out billions of dollars in contracts.
d) It would allow infrastructure to be built from the ground up because people with money start businesses and they want to improve their environment.
I think it is an intriguing idea and I've never seen it brought up before.
Why not? Germany, Japan, Korea and the British did after the second world war.saturnia wrote:
Do you honestly believe that it is still possible to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure after what it has been through?
Not only is this impratical, it is illogical since it is not simply a case of a difference between George Bush and Saddam Hussein. Iraq consists of different factions in a country whose culture is way different from America. Define a 'fake christian'.The best thing to do would be to relocate all Iraqis to America and all Americans to Iraq so they can have a taste of their suffering on daily basis. It is time they learnt that there is no difference between Bush and Saddam, both are one and the same. The only difference is one is a musslim and the other a fake christian.
Absolutely!!!riversandlakes wrote:Before I say the below, let it be known that most of you know where I stand and where I come from - I'm not a hater of anybody.
But have you forgotten that it is how American mendering in other peoples' lives/nations that got them into this mess in the first place? Remember Vietnam?
The real political/economical reasons for this war by Bush is another story all together.
Now who gave you the rights to demand that taxes from THEIR natural resource go to whom and whom? I think it's tad arrogant. Shall Malaysia demand that the US tax their super big oil companies MORE to give out to the American poor? Kind of unheard of, isn't it?
I think you miss the point. Right now, the American plan is that oil revenues will be collected by the so called government in Iraq and then distributed as the government sees fit to "rebuild" Iraq. It has been part of the American plan all along... that Iraqi oil revenues would rebuild the country according to a plan (guaranteed to fail, if you haven't noticed) that the neocons put together.riversandlakes wrote:Before I say the below, let it be known that most of you know where I stand and where I come from - I'm not a hater of anybody.
But have you forgotten that it is how American mendering in other peoples' lives/nations that got them into this mess in the first place? Remember Vietnam?
The real political/economical reasons for this war by Bush is another story all together.
Now who gave you the rights to demand that taxes from THEIR natural resource go to whom and whom? I think it's tad arrogant. Shall Malaysia demand that the US tax their super big oil companies MORE to give out to the American poor? Kind of unheard of, isn't it?
Strong Eagle wrote:I think you miss the point. Right now, the American plan is that oil revenues will be collected by the so called government in Iraq and then distributed as the government sees fit to "rebuild" Iraq. It has been part of the American plan all along... that Iraqi oil revenues would rebuild the country according to a plan (guaranteed to fail, if you haven't noticed) that the neocons put together.riversandlakes wrote:Before I say the below, let it be known that most of you know where I stand and where I come from - I'm not a hater of anybody.
But have you forgotten that it is how American mendering in other peoples' lives/nations that got them into this mess in the first place? Remember Vietnam?
The real political/economical reasons for this war by Bush is another story all together.
Now who gave you the rights to demand that taxes from THEIR natural resource go to whom and whom? I think it's tad arrogant. Shall Malaysia demand that the US tax their super big oil companies MORE to give out to the American poor? Kind of unheard of, isn't it?
Where the money belongs is in the hands of the people. When people have money they spend it. Spending creates a tax base. It creates jobs. It creates a sense of common interest. Over and over again, it has been shown all over the world that when money is given to those it power it rarely accomplishes what it is supposed to. When the people are empowered directly, many good things happen.
You may not have noticed but we are talking BILLIONS upon BILLIONS of dollars here, enough to drag every Iraqi out of poverty. Instead, a handful of corrupt fat cats takes the money, and as you may have noticed, Iraq is still a heap of sh*t years after the invasion.
Current American policy is a total failure. You got a better idea than giving money to the people themselves so that they can make a difference in their own lives?
No offense SE! I believe your statement to be quite true, although priorites do matter here! Tony Blair would have a fit, if he was to read this. Many Brits & Americans would agree, but lets be honest here, charity begins at home, yet we don't see America or the Brits helping their own people.Where the money belongs is in the hands of the people. When people have money they spend it. Spending creates a tax base. It creates jobs. It creates a sense of common interest. Over and over again, it has been shown all over the world that when money is given to those it power it rarely accomplishes what it is supposed to. When the people are empowered directly, many good things happen.
You may not have noticed but we are talking BILLIONS upon BILLIONS of dollars here, enough to drag every Iraqi out of poverty. Instead, a handful of corrupt fat cats takes the money, and as you may have noticed, Iraq is still a heap of sh*t years after the invasion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests