:earthfriendly wrote:Naughty vauclause ! Are we instant messenging or what they call SMS?
Yes indeed. That's my beef with some of the posts that ridicule the CS thread. I do not tolerate bullying behaviours very well. I do not advocate head-to-toe CS to cure one's ills in life. Looking inwardly and trying to find out the root cause is very important. But then again, a little enhancement, if done prudently, can do wonders to one's life.Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:
It's not really fair to asume that people who are vain and obsessed with their looks are not capable of goodness, or is it?
If it has to come down to that, it is indeed sad. But then I say, perhaps we have to keep up with time. You come across as old-fashioned (no offence intendedVaucluse wrote:
I'd still like to hear from parents of these women, and their view on how their children don't like their genes, i.e. their genetic make-up.
Fruits, the lot of them.
Oops, forgot:Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:Regarding most of the posters on the CS thread: Here is my two cents:
**If any of them were my children, I would feel I have failed as a parent
Correct, sadly so
**Because they write in godawful SMS language they sound dumb, even though they may not be
Dey r dum
**they approach the idea as the only solution, rather than the last resort
See above . . .
** no one seems to be concerned with their health or the long term consequences
As above . . .

You work in Bangkok, EF?Vaucluse wrote:earthfriendly wrote: This can also be seen right here at Silicon Valley when the stakes are high. I do not enjoy working and living in vulture-like environment. Can’t wait to leave the area.
OI!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests