That's some serious moral high ground you are taking. Hey, if it looks like trust has been broken, and it looks like it may very well have been, then she's got to look out for HERSELF first and foremost. Would I do the same if I was in her position? Yes. In fact that's how I caught my girlfriend (red handed); and yes, I had strong suspicion before that which lead me to these drastic measures in the first place. That said, I am *very* happy I am not being strung along in a relationship where the other person is cheating on me -- "Dumbass?" I would have been a dumbass NOT to have done what I did: I would still be in that relationship right now. Ultimately it's MY life, not her's and if I can't trust her to be honest I had the RIGHT to find out the truth for myself. If I confronted her with the information I had at the begining, she would have weasled her way out of it (like she did before) -- I needed more proof and I took it upon myself to get it before I accused her of anything. When I finally did get it, a couple of weeks later it was her bragging to her friend how she f*cked some guy on her trip -- pretty much word for word. Morally reprehensible on my part? Maybe, but I can deal with that -- a dumbass? Well, I would have called you the dumbass for not doing what needed to be done and sticking to some idealistic view of privacy.banana wrote:Dude, we're not talking about homicide or treason here. It's not the work computer filled with sensitive information. We're talking about recording what a person types into the keyboard, akin to his most private thoughts, sometimes not even consciously. Would you read your wife's diary if you suspected her of getting jiggy with another man? Newsflash, shit happens.YF wrote:I would argue that the "right" to privacy was taken away when she discovered these messages: this girl needs to do what she needs to do to get to the bottom of this all. The rest of this girls life is in the balance here, and you are worried about "invasion of privacy"??? I think the right to know you can trust your husband, in light of this all, out-trumps one's right to privacy in this instance -- particularly when the truth affects her. Finally, this is not something that SHOULD be kept from her anyways, and therefore should not be "private" information anyways with respect to her.banana wrote:Keylogging? Damn dude, that has got to be the shittiest advice I ever heard. I suppose the concept of privacy doesn't exist.
Agreed though that trust has to be the prime directive. Regardless of whether the bloke's a scumbag, it sounds like the OP is already convinced otherwise. I mean seriously, no matter how much we'd like to portray it, none of us were, are or will be angels.
If this were some kind of criminal case (depending on the severity), similar circumstances regarding a crime would probably give probable cause to get some kind of warrant or wiretap. Sure what she is doing may not be LEGAL, but law is not morality.
Do what you need to do,
RDL
Allowing her to vent? Fine. Providing moral support? If you insist. But providing her with a tool to breach the already paper thin trust between them? Dude, you're a dumbass.
RDL
RDL