sundaymorningstaple wrote:
Agreed, the welfare state is not the answer either, as Eric has so aptly shown. There, however, has to be some kind of safety net as you go about making people redundant without hope. The so-called retraining is fine, but guess what, until you change the employers mindset, all the retraining in the world is not going to make the employer hire a 56 year old person. Now, I could take that even farther if I wanted when it comes to the minorities, but I believe Lim Boon Heng(?) said it last week already regarding the minority job seekers and the employers current hiring practices.
So, yes, I feel that the OP has some valid points.
sms
You hit the nail right on the head there, Wind.Wind In My Hair wrote:I cannot tell you what to think. But I will tell you what I think. I think that if you cannot survive and be happy in this sheltered environment that is Singapore, you will not survive and be happy anywhere else. And until Singaporeans as a whole can have a little backbone and learn to fend for ourselves instead of looking towards the government for everything, we will never be respected. Not by our own government, not by our foreign friends, and not by ourselves.
If I didn't already have my retirement in place I'd have probably jumped long ago. It's that one fact that makes me able to sustain. The problem is I can't retire until two things happen..My son finishes NS and my MiL passes on.Wind In My Hair wrote:Not many people have a 100 acre waterfront property to retire to!
WIMH, this is why the man in the street is scared. They sent out Riot Police for four people (2 men & 2 women). And the government wants the people to speak up? 4 people consitute a Riot?Thursday August 11, 4:50 PM
Riot police break up demonstration of four people in Singapopre
Riot police broke up a rare demonstration by four people demanding greater transparency and accountability in Singapore's state-managed pension fund and other government-linked agencies.
A dozen anti-riot police wearing helmets and knee-high protective gear and carrying shields and batons formed a phalanx outside the offices of the Central Provident Fund (CPF) as a commanding officer approached the demonstrators.
"You are committing an offence of public nuisance. If you don't disperse you will be arrested," the officer told the protesters as business people and employees watched in the central business district.
The four protesters, among them an office administrator and the sister of an opposition leader, Chee Soon Juan, voluntarily dispersed. They denied being part of any political group.
Police later asked them to hand over their protest materials -- T-shirts and placards -- as part of an investigation to determine whether they had violated any laws.
The two men and two women assembled at lunchtime outside the CPF building in the business district. They said they did not need a permit and staged their protest for about an hour.
Under the law, any public protest of at least five people without a police permit is deemed illegal. The protest took place as Singapore was in the midst of official celebrations of its 40th anniversary of independence.
The protesters hoisted placards calling for greater openness in how the government handles public funds used for retirement pensions, overseas investments and the building of subsidized high-rise apartments.
A police officer said they had received a telephone call from a "member of the public" about the protest, prompting them to send in the riot police.
Monica Kumar, 45, one of the protesters, said they had been insipired by public outrage that followed revelations last month that the chief executive of Singapore's biggest charity, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF), was being paid 350,000 US dollars annually.
The scandal sparked an online petition signed by more than 40,000 people and forced the NKF chief executive, T.T. Durai, and the entire board to resign.
"In reality, the NKF is reflective of the entire system in Singapore where public matters are run in a non-transparent and non-accountable manner," the protesters said in a statement.
The statement called on the Housing Development Board and the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) to open their books for public scrutiny.
GIC manages more than 100 billion US dollars in funds and invests globally.
"We call on the government to make Singapore more transparent and accountable, starting with the state organisations mentioned above," the protesters said.
Users browsing this forum: TimeofLedger and 10 guests