riversandlakes wrote:i'm not so sure of that, Eric, else this fiasco wouldn't have happened in the first place.
To knowingly assign a selfish and impatient Staff B to teach any newcomers is a recipe for disaster.
you are right, it is asking for a disaster with that attitude. But sometimes a certain attitude exposed can have different backgrounds (none of them being an excuse, but only a way to understand expsoed behaviour).
I reread my posting and I probably wasnot clear on my thoughts.
In my opinion a manager should instruct, guide and control his or her employees. Give staff B the responsibility of setting up training, let her or him report result and go through together, then have staff A being trained by Staff B. After training sit down shortly with both A and B and evaluate result of training.
In case of problems occurring like being mentioned, it is more visible where things went wrong.
When manangers do not do a good job in guiding their people, the shit will hit the fan eventually. Only when shown their seniority and ability to independantly manage their job, staff A and B should work independant. In my opinion this has not been the case, so a manager should manage them more hands on.
Eric