It would be more helpful if you could point out the lies that you call facts, for heavens sake. Because all I and others see is lies, man.Wham wrote:Apirrea - For the sake of those of us who wonder what people like you think - can you point out the part that is crap - because all i see are facts...
I tried that, "charles de gaulle' and look what google gave me regard french military victories! You sure are a professional historian, NOT.charles de gaulle wrote:Don't treat what others are saying as a true Gospel. Find out for yourselves.
I don't actually believe I claimed that they were. I believe I only pointed out the site and indicated that George, Tony & Johnny weren't to blame. I did not attached blame to anyone and frankly neither did the site, they just gave lots of facts which are up to the user to determine how he/she would like to interpret them. Frankly, I tend to agree with the accepted hypothesis of the 1948 separation and the need for the palistine homeland as well. I have no great love for the Jewish people, or for either side for that matter. I also don't have any great love for my country's involvement either. But that's one of the reasons I've been "Expatriate" for over 2 decades (that's a whole nother topic).Interesting site SMS, but I have to say, that to me the beginning was not the terrorist attacks, as they again are a reaction.
Eric my dear are you feeling okay today?Eric from the Netherlands wrote:Hi Sms,
Peace to you too![]()
I just gave my opinion, wasn't so much concentrating on the fact whether or not you were defending USA's policy. I have seen many of your postings in the past being quite critical of your government in this and I have never felt the urge to debate with you on judging that, as I assume we are thinking in the same direction.
You have a good day ahead!![]()
Eric
Eric, RUMad? wrote:Eric my dear are you feeling okay today?Eric from the Netherlands wrote:Hi Sms,
Peace to you too![]()
I just gave my opinion, wasn't so much concentrating on the fact whether or not you were defending USA's policy. I have seen many of your postings in the past being quite critical of your government in this and I have never felt the urge to debate with you on judging that, as I assume we are thinking in the same direction.
You have a good day ahead!![]()
Eric![]()
From your post above it seems that you are looking for a good amount of bullocking by asking sms to debate the US policy with you on this forum.
My advice to you will be to stay as far away as humanly possible from this and forget about discussing or debating anything with him on this forum, unless you are missing the taste of personal attacks, back stabbing and name calling and are desperate for a repetition. This guy does not have a first clue or an inkling how to discuss or debate unless he becomes vile or personal. Follow my rule guidelines below if you must insist upon discussing or debating anything with him![]()
The best suggestion I can give you is this:
1. You initiate the topic for discussion eg USA's policy, (you have not
said which one).
2. Set the time frame during which the topic of discussion should be
discussed and when it should end.
3 Ouline the rules concerning bad behaviour ie no personal attacks,
name calling and head butting or even butt bumping or banging
allowed. Finalize them and then SET them.
4 Penalty, in case of violation of these rules by either party. Make it
a heavy one!!!
5 When you have debated/discussed enough and you are getting fed
up with the topic then put an end to it or follow the rule guidelines
mentioned above in (2).
This will not only save you some self respect and dignity but also save your sanity and you will be fit enough, mentally and physically to tackle the next topic of interest or should I say 'next topic that interests you' Eric.
Good luck Eric and don't lose heart because we are all watching you and fully supporting you, love.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
These rules can be followed by anyone who is not looking for trouble while discussing topics that interest them on this forum.![]()
![]()
Don't forget, if matters really become too hot to handle then one can always request the moderators to intervene, ONLY, once they have returned from their much deserved summer vacation and long awaited respite from the heavy and horrendous workload of moderating on this forum![]()
Bye for now, dears!!!!
Nothing personal here, sms.
Actually, I believe you are mad RUMad, Or are you just not quite capable of comprehending what has been written. Where in Eric's post did it even remotely indicate that Eric wanted a debate with me? I think you better put on your glasses the next time before you stick your hoof in your mouth again.Eric, RUMad? wrote:Eric my dear are you feeling okay today?Eric from the Netherlands wrote:Hi Sms,
Peace to you too![]()
I just gave my opinion, wasn't so much concentrating on the fact whether or not you were defending USA's policy. I have seen many of your postings in the past being quite critical of your government in this and I have never felt the urge to debate with you on judging that, as I assume we are thinking in the same direction.
You have a good day ahead!![]()
Eric![]()
From your post above it seems that you are looking for a good amount of bullocking by asking sms to debate the US policy with you on this forum.
This should come in handy, Eric the troll, no???Eric, RUMad? wrote:Eric my dear are you feeling okay today?Eric from the Netherlands wrote:Hi Sms,
Peace to you too![]()
I just gave my opinion, wasn't so much concentrating on the fact whether or not you were defending USA's policy. I have seen many of your postings in the past being quite critical of your government in this and I have never felt the urge to debate with you on judging that, as I assume we are thinking in the same direction.
You have a good day ahead!![]()
Eric![]()
From your post above it seems that you are looking for a good amount of bullocking by asking sms to debate the US policy with you on this forum.
My advice to you will be to stay as far away as humanly possible from this and forget about discussing or debating anything with him on this forum, unless you are missing the taste of personal attacks, back stabbing and name calling and are desperate for a repetition. This guy does not have a first clue or an inkling how to discuss or debate unless he becomes vile or personal. Follow my rule guidelines below if you must insist upon discussing or debating anything with him![]()
The best suggestion I can give you is this:
1. You initiate the topic for discussion eg USA's policy, (you have not
said which one).
2. Set the time frame during which the topic of discussion should be
discussed and when it should end.
3 Ouline the rules concerning bad behaviour ie no personal attacks,
name calling and head butting or even butt bumping or banging
allowed. Finalize them and then SET them.
4 Penalty, in case of violation of these rules by either party. Make it
a heavy one!!!
5 When you have debated/discussed enough and you are getting fed
up with the topic then put an end to it or follow the rule guidelines
mentioned above in (2).
This will not only save you some self respect and dignity but also save your sanity and you will be fit enough, mentally and physically to tackle the next topic of interest or should I say 'next topic that interests you' Eric.
Good luck Eric and don't lose heart because we are all watching you and fully supporting you, love.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
These rules can be followed by anyone who is not looking for trouble while discussing topics that interest them on this forum.![]()
![]()
Don't forget, if matters really become too hot to handle then one can always request the moderators to intervene, ONLY, once they have returned from their much deserved summer vacation and long awaited respite from the heavy and horrendous workload of moderating on this forum![]()
Bye for now, dears!!!!
Nothing personal here, sms.
I tried that, "charles de gaulle' and look what google gave me regard french military victories! You sure are a professional historian, NOT.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests