Absolutely not. You owe the agent nothing.newaisa wrote: ↑Sat, 22 Jul 2023 11:42 amHello,
Recently I posted my property for rental online, indicating direct owner and not budgeted for agent commission, indirectly gives tenant more affordability. During viewing I usually schedule more than one potentials for viewing, and eventually closed deal with a tenant.
However, agent approached me and demanded for commission. This particular tenant contacted me through Carousell and agent told me the same tenant contacted him as well. In my opinion this agent really doesn't deserve hefty 1 month commission for reasons:
1. Agent did not show up during viewing, there are 2 families viewing, both contacted me through my direct owner listing
2. Agent Whatsapp me, but did not show up during viewing. There is no specific info which tenant is even through him
3. Owner did all the lease agreement, preparation of contract, onboarding tenant... while agent is MIA
In this case, does the agent have any legal recourse? I seriously don't think there is, at the same time, looking for some feedback what is the right thing to do
Thanks
You owe the agent nothing. You have neither formal nor informal agreement with the agent, he has done no job for you. His demands are completely baseless*. Should he still bother you threaten to inform CEA about his conduct.newaisa wrote: ↑Sat, 22 Jul 2023 11:42 amHello,
Recently I posted my property for rental online, indicating direct owner and not budgeted for agent commission, indirectly gives tenant more affordability. During viewing I usually schedule more than one potentials for viewing, and eventually closed deal with a tenant.
However, agent approached me and demanded for commission. This particular tenant contacted me through Carousell and agent told me the same tenant contacted him as well. In my opinion this agent really doesn't deserve hefty 1 month commission for reasons:
1. Agent did not show up during viewing, there are 2 families viewing, both contacted me through my direct owner listing
2. Agent Whatsapp me, but did not show up during viewing. There is no specific info which tenant is even through him
3. Owner did all the lease agreement, preparation of contract, onboarding tenant... while agent is MIA
In this case, does the agent have any legal recourse? I seriously don't think there is, at the same time, looking for some feedback what is the right thing to do
Thanks
Scammer agents would be pretty hard to find as they are all registered with the CEA and you can check their number easily.
Does CEA take action? I doubt it. But to be fair, I don't see how things will get to that point as the agent has no place to ask for anything.x9200 wrote: ↑Sun, 23 Jul 2023 8:20 amYou owe the agent nothing. You have neither formal nor informal agreement with the agent, he has done no job for you. His demands are completely baseless*. Should he still bother you threaten to inform CEA about his conduct.newaisa wrote: ↑Sat, 22 Jul 2023 11:42 amHello,
Recently I posted my property for rental online, indicating direct owner and not budgeted for agent commission, indirectly gives tenant more affordability. During viewing I usually schedule more than one potentials for viewing, and eventually closed deal with a tenant.
However, agent approached me and demanded for commission. This particular tenant contacted me through Carousell and agent told me the same tenant contacted him as well. In my opinion this agent really doesn't deserve hefty 1 month commission for reasons:
1. Agent did not show up during viewing, there are 2 families viewing, both contacted me through my direct owner listing
2. Agent Whatsapp me, but did not show up during viewing. There is no specific info which tenant is even through him
3. Owner did all the lease agreement, preparation of contract, onboarding tenant... while agent is MIA
In this case, does the agent have any legal recourse? I seriously don't think there is, at the same time, looking for some feedback what is the right thing to do
Thanks
*) unless the T&C of the place you posted included some related clause? But then why to allow you to mark it as "direct"?
It appears that there were only 11 cases last year, so clearly they aren't clamping down too hard, either that, or there just aren't that many incidents.x9200 wrote: ↑Wed, 26 Jul 2023 4:08 amFor anything minor, perhaps just warning. But it likely stays in the records so if such demands are some common practice of the agent it may lead to something more serious. If major, I think they demonstrated in past they can be pretty active and effective.
https://www.cea.gov.sg/professionals/co ... nary-cases
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest