malcontent wrote: ↑Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:05 pm
NYY1 wrote: ↑Mon, 24 Jul 2023 9:42 pm
malcontent wrote: ↑Mon, 24 Jul 2023 9:14 pm
Many locals believe that the level of English spoken and taught here is on par with native English speaking countries like the UK/Ireland/US/AU/NZ. This is mostly because they don’t know what they don’t know. Many even think Singlish is the only difference, take that away and you’ve got the Queen’s English. Reality is, even at the highest levels of proficiency here, the grammatical structure and word choice for locals is often inappropriate or just plain weird in the native context… accents and Singlish aside.
The only way for your kids to acquire near native level of English is to be ensconced in said language. That is best done in a country of native speakers (not Singapore) and the closest thing you can get here is expensive
International Schools — typically the best ones are those aligned to the countries of native speakers. But even then, my son who is attending the American school, his English is near native as you can get in Singapore - but it’s still not 100% up to his counterparts in the US (though substantially better than my daughter in local school). This is due to a combination of factors: exposure to non-native family members, non-native fellow students and sometimes non-native teachers at SAS too.
Some went to or go to those countries with an 800 on the English portion of the SAT (and enter non-math/science streams there). Don't assume that because some can't that means no one else can.
I think we both agree — scoring 800 on the English portion of SAT is not a good measure beyond technical competency.
But I also don’t disagree that many in native English speaking countries can’t cut the cheese; I recall a moment in my time at college in the US — I was doing a project with a Malaysian girl and an African American girl… the Malaysian was correcting her English and was clearly the stronger of the two; despite being non-native.
You should read some of the pieces kids write that are unrelated to the school syllabus (GEB programmes, own publications, etc). Or possibly know the capabilities of the students that have got into the best universities in a couple of those countries. Test scores aside, I don't think they have problems expressing themselves or their thoughts effectively, even when compared to their new peers. Remember, some people have spent substantial time in other countries, so maybe they aren't as clueless as you seem to think they are.
Anyways, I don't even think all of what you allege above has ever been claimed here. Perhaps you were responding to general comments or beliefs you've heard elsewhere? I've only said there are kids that focus on languages and speak good English (and certain fractions of parents did in a prior time too). Absolutely nothing was said about the aggregate level of English in the local schools or what is taught. There were, however, suggestions on what to do if one wants to build up their language skills.
And I would agree with some of what you are saying. It's the same reason why the Higher Chinese standard is where it is. But if you know, there are kids in other countries that can get their English to the same level mentioned above as well. So again, some can - that's all that has ever been said.