Can imagine that over time the loss of contributions would really add up (and come back to bite their old a*ses in the future).
To me I think it is most important for contribution rates to be highest when one is at the prime of their careers, force them to save more when they are making the most and they will have a lot to fall back on when they are older. But I do see the value in increasing contributions during the last lap of one’s career.sundaymorningstaple wrote: ↑Tue, 28 Jun 2022 1:59 pmYep! That's for damned sure! Kept waiting for it to go back to 20:20 and it never did. As I got older and older they raised the rates in dribbles and drips and always for the ages groups below where ever I happened to be. Being a senior here is funny, on the one hand gahmen like to 'look like' they are helping but actually, it's only for show with nothing serious to go with.
#1. That assumes everyone continues on an upward earnings trajectory for 30-40 years but unfortunately not everyone does. Further, once you have some type of lifestyle set (mortgage, etc) it is difficult to change so much. Hence, earning less in the later years often equates to saving less as some costs are viewed as "fixed" (even though they aren't truly fixed). If people don't save or don't save enough when they can, then either directly or indirectly they become a public liability.malcontent wrote: ↑Wed, 29 Jun 2022 8:52 amIt actually makes a lot more sense to have smaller CPF contributions at younger ages and larger contributions when older.
I see. I thought based on the median household income there would likely be a reasonable number of people below the cap. But yes, if well educated and in some professional field or have your own business it is not that difficult to exceed the cap relatively early in one's working career.
It's enforced savings. By not adjusting it upwards regularly against inflation the entire country goes into risk.
You hit the contribution limits at 6k per month. That's the salary a young engineer makes after a few years. It is WAY too low.NYY1 wrote: ↑Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:17 amI see. I thought based on the median household income there would likely be a reasonable number of people below the cap. But yes, if well educated and in some professional field or have your own business it is not that difficult to exceed the cap relatively early in one's working career.
I guess my general point was the increasing $ contributions work well as long as one continues on an upward tend with no bumps. But that isn't such a safe path these days.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests