Damn! I managed to delete an almost complete answer, so here we go again.
Once again, I will note that I have been absent from Singapore for nine years (has it been that long?) and maybe things have changed. OTOH, I remain familiar with Singapore law and the posts that show up in Singapore Expats.
A short education into the roles of directors is in order. The rights, duties, and responsibilities of a director in a Singapore company are specified in the Companies Act and those rights, duties and responsibilities cannot be abridged in any manner through an employment contract, job description or clauses in the articles of incorporation. A director can be help civilly and criminally responsible for all acts of the company. Any senior leaders of a company, like CEO, President, Chairman, etc, are also considered directors under Singapore law, regardless of their actual title.
All the “rent a director” firms will tell you that they are setting you up with a “nominee” director. A nominee director is a director who makes a declaration that their interests are divided between the company and another individual or organization, ie, the "nominee", in this case, you. It’s kind of meaningless and far more applicable when, for example, a bank requires a seat on the board of a company in exchange for a line of credit. This director would report as a nominee because her decisions might favor the bank over the company. The key point is that every director, regardless of titles like managing director, executive director, or nominee director, have exactly the same rights, duties, and responsibilities under the law.
Which means that any rented director that you might hire can be held criminally and civilly liable for the actions of your company, although they will go to great lengths to tell you that they have no responsibilities. They will also tell you they can’t do anything, but that’s not true, either, since their powers of being a director cannot be abridged. It’s highly unlikely that a rented director would perform acts not in your interest, but they could, and you protect yourself with an undated letter of resignation from the director, just in case.
In any event, hiring a rented director means that they will be involved in every aspect of your company. They will be your accountant, auditor, secretary, and bookkeeper. They will insist on access to bank records and transactions. They will be particularly cautious of electronic funds transfers because it’s so easy to facilitate money laundering. They will want to review all your contracts. They will want to verify all the people to whom you send money. They will want to approve your employment pass applications. They will want verification that your income sources are legitimate. They do all this to protect themselves from any nefarious acts that you may commit in the name of the company.
Now, maybe such a setup is appropriate for the bloke who’s starting a new business making durian sandals, but it really seems like overkill if you have an existing business and all you are doing is cranking up a Singapore subsidiary. From quite a few posts over the years (and no, I’m not going to look for them), I understand that it’s possible to form the company and apply for an employment pass at the same time.
The criteria for a director is at least one “normally resident” director. Normally resident doesn’t mean 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, it means that this person will normally be found in Singapore but could be traveling, out of business… whatever. And so, if it’s your intent to move to Singapore and start operating the company, then the timing of company formation and application for EP would be designed to coincide with your date of arrival. You will be shortly “normally resident” so there’s nothing wrong with making you, with your freshly minted EP, the managing director.
Of course, if you’re not planning on being here, then you do need a normally resident director, and unless you’ve got friends or business associates that trust you implicitly, most folks don’t want the liability associated with the role, particularly it it’s unpaid. And that will leave you with the rent a director folks. And the attendant microscope up your company’s ass. And the attendant costs for a secretary, bookkeeping service, auditors, and of course, the rented director.
I cannot tell you the process to get this dual application for company and EP made since it’s been a long time since I’ve dealt with ACRA or MoM. In the past, this would have involved setting up a meeting with MoM to get the preliminary OK for the EP, then setting up the company, going back over to MoM to get the EP approved, then filling in the director in ACRA’s bizfile. In my view, there’s got to be a process for this, as I don’t think that the gahmen is trying to send business to these rented director folks.
stephencexpat wrote: ↑Sun, 03 Jul 2022 8:42 pm
Myasis Dragon.
Many thanks for your comprehensive response.
Clearly the Employment Pass route is the one to go down.
I have people in my network that have successfully relocated to Singapore so I'll ask them to point me in the direction of a credible and competent CPA to advise on the details.
One question if I may: On setting up a wholly owned subsidiary, you mention "If you go this route, then you’ll also be simultaneously applying for an employment pass for you to run the company.
You don’t need a rented directorbut you will need a solid corporate secretary."
My understanding is that a newly incorporated company (including a subsidiary) requires a local resident director to be appointed to the board (on the day of incorporation). I do not have access to one, and my understanding is that it cannot be myself until I am granted an EP, at which point I could become a sole resident director. Before an EP is granted I therefore need a Citizen, PR or Employment Pass or Entrepass holder, or I need to "rent" a stranger from the plethora of outfits advertising their services online.
Are you suggesting that going down the route of setting up a wholly owned subsidiary (versus an alternative route) can potentially negate the requirement for a local resident director to be appointed at incorporation (hence suggesting I don't need to rent one) or am I misunderstanding your point?
If I can set up a subsidiary under the guidance of a qualified CPA and appoint myself at a future date (once (if) the EP has been approved), that would make things somewhat neater. I can't find any guidance that suggests this is permitted though, and I've done a lot of research.
Many thanks again for your guidance which has helped me shortlist the areas I need to explore further with a professional advisor.
- S