It's because Singaporeans are not procreating. They are buying toy dogs instead of getting it on. Singapore's TFR is only 1.09~1.11. You need 2.3 children per couple just to stay at zero population growth. While the population is growing, it's primarily through immigration and we don't know how many children per family we are looking at from that source. Added to that, the government is bringing them in based on existing demographic percentages so that also doesn't give us a clue as to the number's of children is being added in that fashion.
It is broken down by ethnicity but not by economic strata. But if it follows most countries, the poorer the families, the more children they seem to have. I put that down to child labour to help support the families, but then I'm not a demographic analysist either.Myasis Dragon wrote: ↑Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:04 pmIt would be interesting to see how those fertility rates break out in various strata of Singapore society.
I would say focus on career and upward mobility can make some couples postpone, but not forgo. I know several local couples in my office who have chosen to be childless. While economic and lifestyle burdens do loom large, they genuinely don’t feel up to the task and have also convinced themselves that they won’t get any more satisfaction from it than owning a pet.Myasis Dragon wrote: ↑Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:04 pmIs it because Singaporeans don't want to be inconvenienced by children, instead focusing on careers and upward mobility?
I have to agree.sundaymorningstaple wrote: ↑Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:12 amIt is broken down by ethnicity but not by economic strata. But if it follows most countries, the poorer the families, the more children they seem to have. I put that down to child labour to help support the families, but then I'm not a demographic analysist either.Myasis Dragon wrote: ↑Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:04 pmIt would be interesting to see how those fertility rates break out in various strata of Singapore society.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest