Strong Eagle wrote:I'll probably get hacked to death with a dull machete for this, but what the hey...
Why is it so important to women that their relationship with a man include monogamous sex?
Leaving out the disease factor for just a moment, which is indeed a consideration, I just wonder why it is so important to the realtionship. For most men, sex is a very visual, physical thing. NO relationship is required. A man doesn't need a reason, he just needs a place... and a phone booth will be just fine, thank you. Having a quickie doesn't change feelings for the "significant other" one iota.
Is it a case of, "A man searches for every woman to fulfill his one need, while a woman searches for one man to fulfill her every need?"
Hack away.
You are obviously not a man and would not understand what it is to be.Tulip wrote:With all due respect Bafana, using the excuse of trying to fit in a foreign land, being drunk and surrounded by women that will do whatever they want as an excuse to break that trust does not cut it.
Seriously believe what, dear Tulip?Tulip wrote:This is too funny If you seriously believe that you're in for a rude shock!
I find it amusing when you talk to a woman, and she claims she is the horny type;Bafana wrote:You are obviously not a man and would not understand what it is to be.
Strong Eagle wrote:
Helloooooooo Anne!!!!!
That's a little sad you're not saying "I don't cheat because I don't see the need to." Oh well.Strong Eagle wrote:Dear Global,
Actually, I don't cheat because I know it would hurt my wife, and it would damage my own integrity because I said I wouldn't.
Having said that, I don't think I would make sexual fidelity a condition of marriage, if I had it to do all over again.
Tulip wrote:That's a little sad you're not saying "I don't cheat because I don't see the need to." Oh well.Strong Eagle wrote:Dear Global,
Actually, I don't cheat because I know it would hurt my wife, and it would damage my own integrity because I said I wouldn't.
Having said that, I don't think I would make sexual fidelity a condition of marriage, if I had it to do all over again.
In any case if both parties agree to not making sexual fidelity a condition of marriage and both are happy with that arrangement then to each his/her own I say. At least both parties are having the best of both world and not just one who thinks it's acceptable because that's the way it is - in the partriachal society that is.
That's why I always say only get married when you feel you really really want to and you are ready to make a commitment to each other.
That's enough on the topic for me. I've said my piece. Peace.
Good luck on the move V66. You will like it here. Cheers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests