https://www.motorist.sg/article/626/tra ... afer-roads
Right here Retard. Can't wait for you to be the first charged. Providing evidence of hidden police camera or speed traps is CLASSIC perversion of the course of justice. Who was your legal counsel? That mad man Raja? While I see this is in partnership with the TP I suspect this will be a short lived partnership as there will at some point be a review. Anyways I wouldn't trust the TP as far as I can throw them and it would not surprise me a single iota if they didn't understand that they also are stupidly perverting the course of justice. Literally the second stupidest Singapore gahmen group after that Moron Josephine.emergency234 wrote: ↑Sat, 13 Jun 2020 8:37 amhttps://www.motorist.sg/article/626/tra ... afer-roads
Thats where you are wrong.Similarly for Waze.Not illegal
What lol.Its not a radar detector.The locations of, at least ,the fixed cams are published regularly on mainstream media.Its pre-programmed locations and not ' live ' .PNGMK wrote: ↑Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:10 amRight here Retard. Can't wait for you to be the first charged. Providing evidence of hidden police camera or speed traps is CLASSIC perversion of the course of justice. Who was your legal counsel? That mad man Raja?
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice
204A. Whoever does an act that has a tendency to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice —
(a) knowing that the act is likely to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice; or
(b) intending to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years, or with fine, or with both.
The TP have stated they will start using mobile hidden cameras. Disclosing the location of those is absolutely perversion of the course of justice. I agree the known fixed cameras (red light and speed) locations are not the issue. My point is that readers of this forum use those products with a level of legal risk they should be aware of. I should add that publishing locations of TP checking drivers for intoxication is an issue that some police depts has raised with Waze.emergency234 wrote: ↑Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:19 amWhat lol.Its not a radar detector.The locations of, at least ,the fixed cams are published regularly on mainstream media.Its pre-programmed locations and not ' live ' .PNGMK wrote: ↑Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:10 amRight here Retard. Can't wait for you to be the first charged. Providing evidence of hidden police camera or speed traps is CLASSIC perversion of the course of justice. Who was your legal counsel? That mad man Raja?
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice
204A. Whoever does an act that has a tendency to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice —
(a) knowing that the act is likely to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice; or
(b) intending to obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 7 years, or with fine, or with both.
Do you also think that Waze with pretty much the same functionality built in is illegal.
On Singapore roads , the warnings for fixed speed cams are advertised way before they come up - no subversion of justice.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests