Hi SE,
Many thanks for your insights and recommendations. I was hoping you would reply and greatly appreciate you taking the time to provide so many details.
Strong Eagle wrote:You have multiple situations with which you must deal. First and foremost is your legal residency situation in Singapore. You are going to get whacked sooner or later with your 90 day visa runs, and that is going to permanently alter your plans when you can no longer get back into Singapore.
You have a couple of choices to obtain legal residency. You can attempt legal residency status through someone else’s legal residency or you can try for your own. For the first choice, it is the EP of your partner that you will need to rely upon, and, you have exactly one path with respect to getting a residency permit via your partner: Get married in the eyes of Singapore. I’ll deal with the second choice further into this note.
You will need to go to the Australian High Commission in Singapore and obtain a letter attesting to the fact that Australia agrees that you are common law married. Be aware that this varies by state and territory, and I have no idea what evidence you will need to present to obtain your letter. Your JP letter will be insufficient for Singapore, you’ll need the high commission letter, and maybe they are going to want your JP letter as part of the evidence. Common law marriage gets you and LTVP and not a DP, although for your purposes, it won’t matter. Common law marriage also means that you are bound by the law with respect to marriage, something more than a couple of folks have failed to realize.
Agree 100%, it’s the lack of any sort of legitimate residency that’s my primary concern. Sadly, the requirements to achieve Australian de facto relationship status, my prerequisite for a shot at LTVP, are not that simple to understand or execute.
http://www.mom.gov.sg/passes-and-permit ... s-required
According to MOM I need one of these three things:
#1.
Copy of the common-law marriage certificate.
#2.
A letter from the embassy acknowledging that the work pass holder (WPH) and spouse are in a common-law relationship under the laws of their country.
#3.
An affidavit from the WPH declaring that the WPH and spouse are in a common-law relationship under the laws of their country. The affidavit must also be notarised in that same country.
http://singapore.embassy.gov.au/sing/consular.html
And yet according to ACH:
Please note that the Australian High Commission cannot issue individual letters for de facto spouses or witness a statutory declaration regarding their de facto status.
https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about/co ... lationship
http://smartraveller.gov.au/services/le ... letter.pdf
Anyway, proving our de facto status shouldn’t be difficult according to the pages linked above. We’ve been together for 7 years and have co-signed leases both in Australia and our current one in Singapore (I signed while I still had EP). Yet Option #2 seems off the cards already if ACH “cannot” issue an acknowledgement letter or notarise a declaration. From their wording it seems that even if we got the JP declaration they still wouldn't hand over a letter. But this shouldn't matter? Since the notarised declaration itself would suffice according to MOM.
http://www.bdm.nsw.gov.au/Documents/app ... ration.pdf
Option #1 is also complicated (because why wouldn’t it be?

). We can apply remotely for de facto relationship registration, however at least one of us must be a resident in the state of application, and neither of us has lived Australia for years.
Thus it seems to me that Option #3 is the only viable one, for my partner to get his affidavit notarised in Australia in person. If anyone reading this has any experience otherwise please do share, I’d love to avoid the long flight if there’s any shot at getting this sorted at the embassy. I’ll call both ACH and MOM on Monday to check if any exceptions may be made in our case.
Strong Eagle wrote:Let’s talk about Singapore tax residency. If you are normally resident (that means you have an EP, DP, LTVP, SC, or PR), then you will pay tax on your earned (active) income in Singapore, regardless of where you earned it, regardless of there the bank is located that your salary was paid into, and regardless of the location of the entity that is paying you. Example: You do remote work for a Boston based fashion boutique. They pay you in French Francs into a Swiss bank account. You file your personal income tax return in Singapore.
It is worth emphasizing this before moving on to your business entities: It doesn’t matter if you work for a company that is a legal entity of Singapore, only sells products in Singapore, or has absolutely no connection to Singapore at all. You pay your personal income in Singapore.
This answers one of your questions: You are tax resident in Singapore if you live here with a legal residency pass. Singapore and Australia do have a double taxation agreement. I am not familiar enough to provide additional advice about Australia taxation. I am plenty familiar with US tax laws and will comment upon your US company idea a bit further in.
Great to hear for Singapore. I have absolutely no problem with paying tax here, it's just getting permission to do so that's tricky. For Australia, my understanding is you only pay tax on active income if you’re a resident on the 183 day rule (it might be 90 days, I forget), or if conducting business connected to Australia. Have spent many an hour on hold with the ATO regarding tax obligations as I neglected to properly close off some business affairs before leaving Australia. Finally they confirmed I’m out of the tax system and thus don’t need to file any returns until such time as I re-establish residency; active income earned while residing overseas is not subject to Australian tax provided the country of residence collects tax on said income. So that part, at least, is relatively straightforward.
Strong Eagle wrote:Next, let’s talk work passes. If you work for a company that has no legal presence in Singapore, ie, not registered as a legal entity, no office, no nothing, and that company does no business in Singapore of any kind, ie, it does not ship goods to end consumers in Singapore, or rent space, or drop ship, for example, then you do not need a work permit to work for that company. I have verified this with MoM. Example: There was an accountant who moved to Singapore with her husband. She continued to do the books for the company she as working for, doing so remotely with her home computer. The company had no presence whatsoever in Singapore. No work permit required.
Therefore, on a DP or LTVP, you can work for a company anywhere, yours or not, so long as it isn’t entangled with Singapore in any way. Were you to “get them made here and ship over” as you suggested, you would no longer be working remotely, you would be working locally, and would need a business entity AND a work permit. But, you really might want a Singapore business entity when you consider the tax implications of forming a US based LLC.
All very useful to know, especially the working remotely vs. locally tip. Does permission to work for offshore companies also extend to EP holders, or are they not allowed to work in any capacity beyond the terms of their EP employment? If the latter, then I'd lean toward the LTVP + some kind of offshore setup, as I don’t think you can have an LTVP and start/manage your own Singapore company at the same time? Actually I’m not sure about that last one, just get the impression it would look like I was trying to get around EP requirements if I did this.
Strong Eagle wrote:So, let’s talk about those implications. Depending upon your declaration, your single member LLC will be treated by the IRS as either a sole proprietorship and you will have to report your earnings on form 1040, Schedule C, or you will have to declare as a subchapter S corporation with you as the single shareholder, in which case all profit and loss passes to you as wages and income (generally) for inclusion on your form 1040 US income tax return. As you might guess, this implies that you will need a taxpayer identification number.
Unfortunately, you will be subject to US taxes, and onerous taxes at that. It doesn’t matter that your fulfillment of goods and services happens elsewhere, all that matters is that you are the primary member of a domestically registered LLC. But, since you are a foreign member of the LLC, the foreign partner of the LLC will be deemed to be engaged in a US trade or business and the LLC must withhold 35% of its profits for taxes, paid and filed on a quarterly basis to the IRS. Plenty of people have also run afoul of dual taxation treaties by using an LLC, so you’d also need to check this out very carefully with respect to your Australian tax situation.
I was planning on the sole proprietorship treatment. Australia and US have a tax treaty but since I'm not an Australian resident I don't think I can apply it to exempt withholding tax. Singapore and the US don't have a treaty but Singapore does offer some kind credits and exemptions I might be able to use. I wasn't able to find clear information online re. how this might work with the US in particular, so was going to consult with a CPA who hopefully has more of a clue than me.
An ITIN would actually be of use in setting up the US bank account; apparently most banks don’t accept non-resident alien clients these days and those that do prefer you have an ITIN if you don’t have an SSN.
Anyway I guess that’s neither here nor there if the US LLC is in fact a shit idea. Google is overflowing with conflicting information on tax treatment of non-resident aliens. After a few weeks of reading and re-reading various blog posts and IRS PDFs, I’d nearly been swayed towards the position of this fine gentleman:
http://ustax.bz/non-us-entrepreneurs/.
Granted he comes across shady as hell, but on the other hand he’s an experienced CPA and US tax attorney and Googling his name + ‘scam’ or + ‘reviews’ only brings up one minor customer service complaint. Some other self-proclaimed tax expert netizens agree with him, others don’t. Still, I suppose ‘too good to be true’ claims usually are, especially when the guy so claiming sells associated services. Speaking with several different impartial professionals and asking about specific case rulings pertaining to this subject is on my long list of To-Dos.
Which is not to imply I'm discounting your advice in any way; you obviously know more about this stuff than me by many orders of magnitude and I'm very grateful. I merely want to get as many qualified opinions as possible. Due diligence and all that fun. Though just from a common sense standpoint, it’s not hard at all to believe that voluntarily embroiling myself in US tax system could turn out to be a dumb move.
Strong Eagle wrote:My view is that you have two choices. You form a company in Singapore, then apply for your own EP. I’ve written many times on this subject. There are hurdles to be overcome, but if you have experience, a good business plan, and money, you can succeed. Do not look at the Entrepass… that isn’t going to work for you. Having an EP, not having an EP, blah blah blah, doesn’t matter… it’s experience, plan, money.
Anyone can start a company in Singapore… you don’t need a work permit of any kind to be a shareholder. You need a work permit to work for the company in any capacity.
Thanks for referring me to the other threads. Have had a look through and don't think the Singapore company + EP option is viable in my case. I had a successful e-commerce store in Australia some years back, but what I want to do now would be a completely different model and target market for me. I have no track record or sales to show either for the type of products or for the US market. So based on discussions in other threads, I don't think MOM would approve me for an EP.
Strong Eagle wrote:If you have a friend that has a Singapore registered private limited, then this might be a good way to go. Again, you’ll need to demonstrate the need for the EP with good documentation, but there is nothing to prevent a Singapore company from jumping into additional lines of business. You might be able to do it with a LOC… depends on what the company is doing, how active it is, turnover, etc. Your friend probably doesn’t understand all the implications of giving you an EP. He’s responsible for your bond, filing IR8A’s for your taxes, and taxes paid on profits that you might earn. But, it’s still the best way, I judge.
I'd rather not involve my friend's company directly in my business, especially if I go the dropshipping from Asia route which comes with counterfeit and QC risks baked in. Wouldn't be fair to pass those risks onto him. So for Idea #2, we were tossing around the notion of a non-kosher setup where I pay him so he can pay my EP salary but I don’t actually do work for him or just do token work. Another Australian friend of ours has long had this arrangement with his Singaporean friend's company so apparently it can be done. In which case I’d be allowed to live and pay taxes here and could also work for my offshore entity. But as mentioned earlier, such an arrangement is an inherently shady, so I'd rather avoid it.
Strong Eagle wrote:Or, you form an offshore company somewhere with low taxes. Lots of places to do this. Bank accounts for internet transactions might be a bit more of a challenge.
One thing I would recommend is staying as far away as possible from creating any kind of legal entity in the USA. You want to sell product in the USA? Contract with a firm with a USA presence and stay at arm’s length as an independent.
I'm thinking LTVP + offshore is my safest and simplest path for now ... would you agree? Since establishing a US company seems like a no-go, do you have any recommendations for suitable jurisdictions? I looked briefly at places like Panama, Belize and BVI but was then advised that a Wyoming LLC would be best for my situation. (Said adviser is a rep for a company that sells Wyoming LLC registration services, surprisingly enough!

)
Looks like I'll have to do more research re. the US bank account. There may be a few banks left that'll consider opening for an offshore company. Perhaps not for such places as mentioned above though.
PNGMK wrote:I agree with SE on avoiding the Wyoming thing. For some reason it's the current sexy response to the issue of getting a back k account and low tax entity but I tend to agree avoiding IRS is a good idea.
If your business plan is viable have your friend add it into his existing business as a subsidiary activity.
Hi PNGMK,
Appreciate you replying with your insights. Also your contributions to the forum in general, I've been reading a lot of value from both you and SE in the course of my research.
Thanks again both!