From what I know no need to notifyMn2kl wrote:Hi there, i think I know the answer but just wanted to check anyway.. I presume there is an obligation or process that requires your current employer to be notified, whenever their employer( on EP) submits an application for a Personalised Employment pass.. Is that right?
Am thinking about doing so but I think it would alarm my employers as they'll naturally think I'm looking for flexibility to resign
Thanks!
Thats what everybody believes ..Mn2kl wrote:Thank you that's great advice! I guess PEP is viewed more favorably for PR application because you're deemed to be more of a "desirable" future member of their society other than the income threshold and not holding a sponsored EP, any key tips on what will help qualify me for PEP? Thank you again.
PEP can be granted I guess pretty easily for high profile managers but when it comes to PR it may be just the other way around because this group is mobile and will follow their jobs.Mn2kl wrote:Thank you that's great advice! I guess PEP is viewed more favorably for PR application because you're deemed to be more of a "desirable" future member of their society
Well, post 2010, Singapore has been finding ways to reduce the resident population.Mn2kl wrote:Thank you. Yes, it's a fair point, and I suppose we can debate it both ways but at the end of the day we've no idea what they will ultimately judge it as. I personally see PEP as an option that gives me greater flexibility whilst also at least giving me the jusitfication (valid or otherwise..) that it's a step towards PR.
Thanks again for your responses!
Thanks again all.ecureilx wrote:Well, post 2010, Singapore has been finding ways to reduce the resident population.Mn2kl wrote:Thank you. Yes, it's a fair point, and I suppose we can debate it both ways but at the end of the day we've no idea what they will ultimately judge it as. I personally see PEP as an option that gives me greater flexibility whilst also at least giving me the jusitfication (valid or otherwise..) that it's a step towards PR.
Thanks again for your responses!
One way is to convert those holding 'redundant' residency, i.e those given PR but Govt don't want them to be future citizens, possibly.
another example of the govt direction, is, say, SC married a Foreigner, in the past, PR or SC was pretty given.
Now, ICA pushes for LTVP, and / or LTVP + and after 3 years, consider for PRs.
And if the candidates asks for PR, ICA says "what is the pressing need for PR ? You just want to stay here right ? "..
In a way, LTVP is same as PR but not the same, when it comes to certain privileges.
Good luck !!!
Not sure how it goes for PEP, but for other purposes, it is basic.Mn2kl wrote: One other question which may be kind of dumb but I'd rather be shameless than get this wrong.. The "fixed monthly salary" requirement - I assume this refers to gross salary, eg. Before pension or medical deductions have benefits made, and NOT the net salary that goes into my bank account? My salary statements do show both!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests