They were not supposed to, so it was cheating.DrScrumMaster wrote:I'm still struggling to work out how this is actually a scam of cheating.
They used computers instead of just their own heads to work out when was best the play the one-armed bandits, so what?
Which is why I don't understand why card counting is cheating. Isn't that what one's supposed to do, just that some people do it better than others? I mean, you're supposed to remember what's been bid and played when playing bridge in order to work out what's likely to be in someone's hand.x9200 wrote:BTW, you may find watching the Rain Man movie interesting.
Rules or not, why is it a criminal matter? Fouling someone on a football pitch does not get one arrested.x9200 wrote:Leaving aside whether something is fair or not, there are just rules to be followed and that's it.
Cheating so you gain some money is a criminal matter.DrScrumMaster wrote:Rules or not, why is it a criminal matter? Fouling someone on a football pitch does not get one arrested.x9200 wrote:Leaving aside whether something is fair or not, there are just rules to be followed and that's it.
Very interesting. Thanks for that link PNGMK. How is it possible that modern implementations of RNG does not rely on any human or environmental (i.e. temperature) entropy?PNGMK wrote:http://wrd.cm/2kyWY5A
When we were designing RNG's (back in 1988) we looked at white noise being a source of randomness. That 'white noise' is ultimately cosmic radiation. Filtering down and sampling tiny amounts of slices of it is how we eventually got a 'PRNG' - we needed that because of regulation. A truly random number generator would have freaked out the regulator. The regulator's used bin tests (historgrams) and they want to see every bin level out for the number series... which is not random.x9200 wrote:Very interesting. Thanks for that link PNGMK. How is it possible that modern implementations of RNG does not rely on any human or environmental (i.e. temperature) entropy?PNGMK wrote:http://wrd.cm/2kyWY5A
But the white noise, wasn't it tabelarized at that time rather than recorded on demand?PNGMK wrote:When we were designing RNG's (back in 1988) we looked at white noise being a source of randomness. That 'white noise' is ultimately cosmic radiation. Filtering down and sampling tiny amounts of slices of it is how we eventually got a 'PRNG' - we needed that because of regulation. A truly random number generator would have freaked out the regulator. The regulator's used bin tests (historgrams) and they want to see every bin level out for the number series... which is not random.x9200 wrote:Very interesting. Thanks for that link PNGMK. How is it possible that modern implementations of RNG does not rely on any human or environmental (i.e. temperature) entropy?PNGMK wrote:http://wrd.cm/2kyWY5A
I'm not sure what you're asking.x9200 wrote:But the white noise, wasn't it tabelarized at that time rather than recorded on demand?PNGMK wrote:When we were designing RNG's (back in 1988) we looked at white noise being a source of randomness. That 'white noise' is ultimately cosmic radiation. Filtering down and sampling tiny amounts of slices of it is how we eventually got a 'PRNG' - we needed that because of regulation. A truly random number generator would have freaked out the regulator. The regulator's used bin tests (historgrams) and they want to see every bin level out for the number series... which is not random.x9200 wrote: Very interesting. Thanks for that link PNGMK. How is it possible that modern implementations of RNG does not rely on any human or environmental (i.e. temperature) entropy?
Ha. Yeah randomness is not really a thing in this deterministic universe even though we like to think it is.Strong Eagle wrote:Dogs years ago, I was responsible for writing a jury pull system. Names (and ID numbers) were gathered from property tax rolls, drivers license registrations, and district clerk records.
As you know, most randomizers are only pseudo... put the same seed in, get the same sequence out.
Half the people in charge of jury pull hated it because they were convinced that wasn't really random, so I wrote a front end program that grabbed several bits and pieces of extraneous data externally... CPU load, disk activity on a couple of disks, CPU temp, etc. I used this to create the seed so no two runs were ever the same.
Now the other half hated it. A re-run of the program produced a different set of people who were to receive jury summons. We ended up going back to a named seed for each pull.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests