So you haven't been rejected but wanna go on offensive?foodforthought wrote:Hi, PNGMK.
Why do you think so ?
I see the negative side and I am planning to engage a lawyer to make appeal in case of rejection.
But I am not sure what else they can write in the appeal (since the education certs submitted already in the first EP application).
I am not sure if I engage lawyer to appeal, do I need to inform my employer..
If it was a warning there may not be a record. If it was warning with a record then it may be an issue but we have seen people with actual convictions manage to hang on to their EP's. The MOM and ICA have some flexibility but it depends a little on the IO's report. Did the AGC NOT recommend charges? If so why not?foodforthought wrote:Hi, PNGMK.
Why do you think so ?
I see the negative side and I am planning to engage a lawyer to make appeal in case of rejection.
But I am not sure what else they can write in the appeal (since the education certs submitted already in the first EP application).
I am not sure if I engage lawyer to appeal, do I need to inform my employer..
Hi PNGMK,PNGMK wrote:
If it was a warning there may not be a record. If it was warning with a record then it may be an issue but we have seen people with actual convictions manage to hang on to their EP's. The MOM and ICA have some flexibility but it depends a little on the IO's report. Did the AGC NOT recommend charges? If so why not?
And I know a guy who's pass renewal was rejected and after lot of trauma turned out he was suspected of something but nobody bothered to investigate.foodforthought wrote: It is conditional warning, so it comes with record I think.
It is quite ridiculous for actual convictions still get ep renewed ?
Do you mean conviction and pay fine and therefore no record, and ep will be renewed ?
Yes, warning means not recommend charges, should be able to renew but with record it is difficult to say...
You're all over the place here aren't you?foodforthought wrote:Hi PNGMK,PNGMK wrote:
If it was a warning there may not be a record. If it was warning with a record then it may be an issue but we have seen people with actual convictions manage to hang on to their EP's. The MOM and ICA have some flexibility but it depends a little on the IO's report. Did the AGC NOT recommend charges? If so why not?
It is conditional warning, so it comes with record I think.
It is quite ridiculous for actual convictions still get ep renewed ?
Do you mean conviction and pay fine and therefore no record, and ep will be renewed ?
Yes, warning means not recommend charges, should be able to renew but with record it is difficult to say...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests