Take it up with CEA.justin_81 wrote: Does anyone have any tips on this? I am extremely frustrated and angry that I will have to pay out $1,700 even though I did everything I could to get my notice to the landlord.
I agree. In my mind, I pay my estate agent to sort out just these sorts of issues so that I don't have to worry about them and it was her errors in not having the landlord's contact details, in not figuring out who the landlord's estate agent was that caused this mess. As I mentioned, the landlord's estate agent told me he has clear e-mail evidence showing that he made it clear to my estate agent that he was the only agent acting on behalf of the landlord, so she should have known. But practically, how do I get her to pay? What cards am I holding and recourse do I have? Another poster mentioned the CEA, are they a useful resource that I can complain to or at least threaten my estate agent with?x9200 wrote:The first in the line of fire is your agent, not the other agent. Your agent should cover the bill. The fact no proper contact info for the LL or his/her agent was available is also what your agent should have though about. It was his/her duty to take care of such things.
Later, once your agent pays the bill he may have recourse towards the other agents (assuming he can prove what actually has happened).
My 2 cents ?justin_81 wrote:Another poster mentioned the CEA, are they a useful resource that I can complain to or at least threaten my estate agent with?
We still have just over a month till I depart, so I think everyone is just hoping that they get a new tenant which would solve all our problems. I messaged my agent telling her that the Landlord's agent has said he made it clear to her that he was the one that she should have been communicating with. She replied that's not true and that it's a breach of contract for the landlord to have not put their address on the tenancy agreement in the first place so they're in the wrong. The problem was that the "rogue agent" in this case used to work with the current landlord's agent so at one point they were communicating with each other but now longer are.x9200 wrote:CEA is not a bad idea but talk first to your agent. Tell her you expect her to pay, explain the rationale. If she is regretful, no reason for threatening. If refuses, perhaps bluff a bit that you consulted a lawyer and that if not paid, you will have no choice but go to CEA. Also, she may have a professional liability insurance? If nothing helps, go to CEA. If this doesn't help, then SCT is probably your only pragmatic choice.
No, you should do what x9200 suggested right now:justin_81 wrote:My plan is to wait a couple of weeks and see if we get some more viewings and a signal that a new tenant can be obtained ....
If by mid-August there's no sign that a new tenant will be brought in, I'll start pushing a lot harder with both my and the landlord's agent.
x9200 wrote:CEA is not a bad idea but talk first to your agent. Tell her you expect her to pay....
Your agent got paid a commission - she is supposed to take care of issues like this.justin_81 wrote:... it's a great unit, but I'm uncertain as the economy has been slowing and the flow of ex-pats who would typically rent a place like this as slowed dramatically.
+1, than threatening and then finding out the agent switched phone number, or doesn't answer your call - move quickly and get it settled.PNGMK wrote:OP - you need be quick and pro-active. You may have to do an SCT hearing before you leave Singapore. Once you gone you have almost no real chance of sorting this out. Mano is right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests