I think that will change in the years ahead. The PAP surely understand their own demographic, I expect to see the 55 age change upwards to 60+ (after all the offical age of retirement is 62.5? or 65?).sundaymorningstaple wrote:Yeah, but whack your contribution rates to virtually nothing after the age of 60 so it get's difficult unless your employer is willing to work with you.
It's currently 65 but will be raised to 67 by 2017 according to the PM at the last nat'l day rally speech. Every time they raise it I can't retire as I've already past it!PNGMK wrote:I think that will change in the years ahead. The PAP surely understand their own demographic, I expect to see the 55 age change upwards to 60+ (after all the offical age of retirement is 62.5? or 65?).sundaymorningstaple wrote:Yeah, but whack your contribution rates to virtually nothing after the age of 60 so it get's difficult unless your employer is willing to work with you.
Your earlier earnings are inflation adjusted to be re-stated in today's dollars. The problem, of course, is that when most of us were starting out, we weren't earning much.sundaymorningstaple wrote:I'll start drawing Social Security in Sept of 2017 as I'll be 70 and it's wont be increasing the payouts after 70 so makes no sense not to start drawing as I'll be receiving the maximum pittance then. (my quarters were obtained over 40 years ago so it's somewhat of a joke anyway).
I'm considering applying for US LPR and paying into SS. I would have to pay 40 quarters (10 years). Would this be more advantageous that the case of SMS where his 40 quarters were at a much lower wage than mine as they are now? IF so - should SMS have paid in a few years back at a higher rate to increase his actual payouts?Strong Eagle wrote:Your earlier earnings are inflation adjusted to be re-stated in today's dollars. The problem, of course, is that when most of us were starting out, we weren't earning much.sundaymorningstaple wrote:I'll start drawing Social Security in Sept of 2017 as I'll be 70 and it's wont be increasing the payouts after 70 so makes no sense not to start drawing as I'll be receiving the maximum pittance then. (my quarters were obtained over 40 years ago so it's somewhat of a joke anyway).
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/retirebenefit1.html
It aint Obamacare, SMS... it's the goddamn insurance companies that are screwing you. Start supporting a single payer system.PNGMK wrote:I'm considering applying for US LPR and paying into SS. I would have to pay 40 quarters (10 years). Would this be more advantageous that the case of SMS where his 40 quarters were at a much lower wage than mine as they are now? IF so - should SMS have paid in a few years back at a higher rate to increase his actual payouts?Strong Eagle wrote:Your earlier earnings are inflation adjusted to be re-stated in today's dollars. The problem, of course, is that when most of us were starting out, we weren't earning much.sundaymorningstaple wrote:I'll start drawing Social Security in Sept of 2017 as I'll be 70 and it's wont be increasing the payouts after 70 so makes no sense not to start drawing as I'll be receiving the maximum pittance then. (my quarters were obtained over 40 years ago so it's somewhat of a joke anyway).
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/retirebenefit1.html
Benefits start at 20 quarters. IF you worked 7 years you are already there. That looks like the right link to me.earthfriendly wrote:Hello guys, since we are in this discussion, wonder if you can answer some questions for me? I have little idea on how SS work and going to try to use this link for estimation. Is it legit since it will ask for your SSN? I think I work for about 7 years or less previously but my husband has been working continously for 25 years. And I started working part time again two years agao. Since I don't have 40 quarters, do I even qualify for SS, based on my husband's continuos working status?
https://www.ssa.gov/retire/estimator.html
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests