Singapore Expats Forum

SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Discuss about any latest news or current affairs in Singapore or globally. Please DO NOT copy and paste news articles from other sources without written permission.
Post Reply
Pal
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1289
Joined: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 2:44 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:

SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by Pal » Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:03 pm

SGH apologises for its lapses and says it has started on plans to close the gaps identified by the Independent Review Committee.

The Independent Review Committee said the Hepatitis C cluster was likely caused by infection control breaches, and there were gaps found in the response.

In October, SGH announced that 25 patients in its renal ward had contracted the virus. The hospital has screened hundreds of patients and staff following the discovery of the cluster.

More details at:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/sin ... 28788.html
Singapore Expats

Home | Classifieds | Condo | Forum | Property
Image

User avatar
ecureilx
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 9811
Joined: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 5:18 pm

Re: RE: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by ecureilx » Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:28 pm

Pal wrote:...
And a middle ground review .


http://themiddleground.sg/2015/12/09/me ... a-ward-67/

User avatar
Barnsley
Manager
Manager
Posts: 2319
Joined: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 5:22 pm
Location: Pasir Ris
Contact:

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by Barnsley » Fri, 11 Dec 2015 5:56 pm

I cannot believe there hasnt been any resignations/sackings over any of these issues.

How to create trust when nobody is willing to take responsibility for anything.

A joke!!
Life is short, paddle harder!!

User avatar
ecureilx
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 9811
Joined: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 5:18 pm

Re: RE: Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by ecureilx » Fri, 11 Dec 2015 6:33 pm

Barnsley wrote:I cannot believe there hasnt been any resignations/sackings over any of these issues.

How to create trust when nobody is willing to take responsibility for anything.

A joke!!
Sacking / resignation? Considering how the renal wards operate it's not fair for anyone at lower level to be fired and top ? That's a thought though ...

Sporkin
Chatter
Chatter
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 2:16 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by Sporkin » Fri, 11 Dec 2015 7:00 pm

ecureilx wrote:
Barnsley wrote:I cannot believe there hasnt been any resignations/sackings over any of these issues.

How to create trust when nobody is willing to take responsibility for anything.

A joke!!
Sacking / resignation? Considering how the renal wards operate it's not fair for anyone at lower level to be fired and top ? That's a thought though ...
Sacrilegious! That will create precedence for more accountability at the top, move along we have it all under control...

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

earthfriendly
Manager
Manager
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 5:01 pm

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by earthfriendly » Sat, 12 Dec 2015 8:49 am

It is super annoying whenever I read someone has to be fired or commit suicide after the incident. There is a lot of freedom (to explore different ways of doing things and do good) when people feel they are allowed to make choices and make mistakes. I don't see the point of firing or over-faulting them for an honest mistake. It is thru trial and error that let them refine their practices. Also, if you try to replace them with new blood, it is a whole new learning curve all over again.

User avatar
sundaymorningstaple
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 36270
Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by sundaymorningstaple » Sat, 12 Dec 2015 8:52 am

^^^This.

Although, we are not talking about train stoppages here, but human lives. Bit of a difference in this case, don't you think?

earthfriendly
Manager
Manager
Posts: 1996
Joined: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 5:01 pm

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by earthfriendly » Sat, 12 Dec 2015 8:59 am

The existing team understands that there were lapses and receptive to recommendations for fixes. Let them continue to do their good work and learn from this. Unless there is blatant disregard and unprofessionalism involved. I don't see why people need to get fired.

User avatar
x9200
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9409
Joined: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 4:06 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by x9200 » Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:00 pm

earthfriendly wrote:The existing team understands that there were lapses and receptive to recommendations for fixes. Let them continue to do their good work and learn from this.
Of course. They should be even rewarded for admitting something was wrong. Receptive to recommendations for fixes after destroying few lives? So extraordinary. Let them have on top of the reward the 14th and 15th salary bonuses!
earthfriendly wrote:Unless there is blatant disregard and unprofessionalism involved. I don't see why people need to get fired.
This is not an ordinary job. For a blatant disregard they should be fired and prosecuted. If they failed because of a basic misconduct they should be fired. But they should not be fired in case something was beyond their control or has not fallen under reasonable/practice expectations.

Note, we don't know what actually happened.

User avatar
ecureilx
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 9811
Joined: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 5:18 pm

Re: RE: Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by ecureilx » Sat, 12 Dec 2015 1:30 pm

x9200 wrote:But they should not be fired in case something was beyond their control or has not fallen under reasonable/practice expectations..
From the chatter in volunteer groups, the direction is the staff were following procedure. Which in medical line, keeps changing due to discoveries and such.

An example, for CPR it has changed to focus on compression if rhere is no one way valve vs the previous notion that ventilation was extremely important.

And working in Renal is dealing with blood and such multiple times a day.

I would not want to see and medical staff have their record tainted for following procedures.

User avatar
x9200
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9409
Joined: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 4:06 pm
Location: Singapore

Re: RE: Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by x9200 » Sat, 12 Dec 2015 2:32 pm

ecureilx wrote:
x9200 wrote:But they should not be fired in case something was beyond their control or has not fallen under reasonable/practice expectations..
From the chatter in volunteer groups, the direction is the staff were following procedure. Which in medical line, keeps changing due to discoveries and such.
[..]
And working in Renal is dealing with blood and such multiple times a day.

I would not want to see and medical staff have their record tainted for following procedures.
The HCV transmission is almost always about blood so hard to make an excuse out of the fact that they worked with blood. So is the renal ward job.
Following procedure, ok, unless they noticed something that would be a potential hazard (and they should have noticed it based on their knowledge and expected skills) and failed to inform their superiors/person in charge.

calugaruvaxile
Chatter
Chatter
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 9:39 am

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by calugaruvaxile » Tue, 15 Dec 2015 1:00 am

earthfriendly wrote:It is super annoying whenever I read someone has to be fired or commit suicide after the incident. There is a lot of freedom (to explore different ways of doing things and do good) when people feel they are allowed to make choices and make mistakes. I don't see the point of firing or over-faulting them for an honest mistake. It is thru trial and error that let them refine their practices. Also, if you try to replace them with new blood, it is a whole new learning curve all over again.

what sgporeans can't understand is that some "young blood" people's "performance curb" may reach (far) higher than that of the "old blood". even if for 6 months it's a little bit below

User avatar
Barnsley
Manager
Manager
Posts: 2319
Joined: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 5:22 pm
Location: Pasir Ris
Contact:

Re: SGH 'determined to regain trust of Singaporeans' after Hepatitis C outbreak

Post by Barnsley » Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:19 am

x9200 wrote:
earthfriendly wrote:The existing team understands that there were lapses and receptive to recommendations for fixes. Let them continue to do their good work and learn from this.
Of course. They should be even rewarded for admitting something was wrong. Receptive to recommendations for fixes after destroying few lives? So extraordinary. Let them have on top of the reward the 14th and 15th salary bonuses!
earthfriendly wrote:Unless there is blatant disregard and unprofessionalism involved. I don't see why people need to get fired.
This is not an ordinary job. For a blatant disregard they should be fired and prosecuted. If they failed because of a basic misconduct they should be fired. But they should not be fired in case something was beyond their control or has not fallen under reasonable/practice expectations.

Note, we don't know what actually happened.
I concur!!
Life is short, paddle harder!!

Post Reply


  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Latest News & Current Affairs”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests