Well, you just made a mistake in the judgement. But in this specific situation it is actually you who tries to impose some of your customs to somebody else, or not? You may see it neutral but for a person who is pre-conditioned it may be not so. This, especially if you see the religions as a manipulative tool. I see it pretty much the same so I always keep in mind that strong preconditioning is hard to overcome.JR8 wrote:I come from a position of not respecting, nay disdaining ALL religion. There is no honourable religion, just varying degrees of manipulation IMHO.
Unfortunately it just bluntly set me apart, than lead to any greater understanding. I hate religion and *that* religion more because of it. Having 'long departed the village' I am of course free to think. Islam and freedom being anathema of course, it requires abandonment to personal moral slavery... but what morals? No thanks....
Sorry... the "higher position" smacks of I'm up/I'm down thinking. Reach out and shake. If the other refuses that's their problem, not yours. And I'll state straight up... if this woman won't shake hands because of alleged religious beliefs, then they are bullshit beliefs.x9200 wrote:Hmmm, I was brought up the way that I hardly ever initiate a handshake with a woman. The rules I follow: always the person of "higher position" (much older etc.) initiates the handshake. With a woman it is always the woman who should initiate it unless this "high position" difference is very substantial (e.g a 85yo Nobel laureate vs young, female teacher).
You said it yourself: your beliefs (social comfort) is more important to you than someone else's beliefs. In this instance, your western standard of social comfort was not appropriate.JR8 wrote:... Then there is that painfully awkward moment when it's not reciprocated and you're standing there wondering why, and you feel embarrassed and/or stupid, and perhaps somewhat annoyed too... their beliefs trump your social comfort.
So, it took me by surprise and left me irritated.
+1. It's a spectrum... and there is religious bullshit up and down that spectrum. I certainly do not accept the so called "religious" beliefs of Texas Christians who want to kill/deny rights/send them somewhere else when it comes to gays.Sporkin wrote:[edit]Actually I'm half serious about this, as much as i like to believe that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs, certain practices like female genital mutilation are simply unsubstantiated by any sound reasoning.
Obviously some cultural or religious values are above others...
Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
In case of handshaking and I've been sick "Oh, I just sneezed/coughed/have a cold and I haven't washed my hand." Or if my hand is wet; "Sorry, my hand is wet." I don't bother doing the hurriedly wiping my hands on my pants so I could shake bit.curiousgeorge wrote: In a similar vein, I can't stand people who want to hug and kiss every time they depart a social gathering. I don't want to be touched by you like that. I usually hold up my hand in a 'stop' sign and just say "I don't do hugs".
In both cases, your presumption is not mine to deal with just to make you feel better.
x9200 wrote:A nonsense is to comparing female genital mutilation, that most often is done not at the will to reservation in shaking someone's hand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests