https://www.pioneers.sg/en-sg/Pages/Home.aspxJR8 wrote: I know who it is targeted at, but what is it for?
Mebbe I'm getting old but I lost track somewhere along the way amongst all the dancing girlsMaybe there should be another version for pre-OAPs, but with less clothing and more lipstick on.
You could see the same kind of thing on Japanese tv since at least 20-30 years ago and still can now, it's totally pedestrian compared with the actual ultra-sexy stuff there that is also completely commonplace.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Damn! You're older than I thoughT! Older'n me apparently. If it were anti-sexual why use cute nubile youngish ladies with reasonably nice bodies, etc. rather than 40~50ish ah peks.x9200 wrote:I don't see it whorish neither. It's a pure kitsch essence and with their legs work similar to what can be seen every day on the streets it's actually anti-sexual.
Because they are nice pretty ladies and are nicer (statistically) than 40-50ish for the same role. Now for me being older, nope, I am just not that desperatesundaymorningstaple wrote:Damn! You're older than I thoughT! Older'n me apparently. If it were anti-sexual why use cute nubile youngish ladies with reasonably nice bodies, etc. rather than 40~50ish ah peks.x9200 wrote:I don't see it whorish neither. It's a pure kitsch essence and with their legs work similar to what can be seen every day on the streets it's actually anti-sexual.
+1 and because unlike some of us he missed out on that all-important range that falls between the two of those.x9200 wrote:Because they are nice pretty ladies and are nicer (statistically) than 40-50ish for the same role. Now for me being older, nope, I am just not that desperatesundaymorningstaple wrote:Damn! You're older than I thoughT! Older'n me apparently. If it were anti-sexual why use cute nubile youngish ladies with reasonably nice bodies, etc. rather than 40~50ish ah peks.x9200 wrote:I don't see it whorish neither. It's a pure kitsch essence and with their legs work similar to what can be seen every day on the streets it's actually anti-sexual.
They just don't move like sexy ladies and ... everything else.
I think the 'why can' question is an easy one - there is a market for it; what is still after all these years beyond me is the 'why' question, as in why would anyone want that kind of thing or a lot of the other weird and wacky things available there. To be fair, there is as much or more 'normal' things there as well.JR8 wrote:Why can the JPnese salaryman buy used girls underpants from vending machines? Why all the rest of the uber-pervy stuff there that's considered just how it is (that I shan't elaborate on).
It's a rat-race from school to grave, and men want more than that [To be clear I'm talking of my experience of the 'Japanese salaryman', from having lived over there, it's an alien framework to me ... or at least .. not alien, but I'm blessed not to have to live it]. Pretty and stable wives don't provide it either. witness the educated etc/etc wives in SG, but the profusion of KTV and similar places.
oh i do?ecureilx wrote:Not sure if your intention is to piss off the natives .. but you are doing a great job so far ..calugaruvaxile wrote:yeah, they look like the innocent girls from the 4 floors of little girls waiting to grow up (something)
As for 'opinions' the local feed back has been positive, though some asked for more dialect versions - and those who gave feedback are the PGs, at whom the campaign is targeted at ..
On that score, I would say it is a success !
eevil me ... 
I would replace Singaporeans with Asians...calugaruvaxile wrote:that singaporeans cannot accept ANY critical view from foreigners - not only that, those who dare publishing books with their views on SG are denied PR, etc. but why should this be my problem?
neil humphreys. why would he be deported? for writing about his landlady??? wth???ecureilx wrote: Who didn't get PR because of his or her view on Singapore? Am Curious to know ..
Well, refusing PR is so lame. Try another ASEAN country, the person would have been jailed, his assets confiscated, and duly deported when he got out of jail.. even if he had a local spouse and children...
Are you making it up ? Nice.calugaruvaxile wrote:neil humphreys. why would he be deported? for writing about his landlady??? wth???ecureilx wrote: Who didn't get PR because of his or her view on Singapore? Am Curious to know ..
Well, refusing PR is so lame. Try another ASEAN country, the person would have been jailed, his assets confiscated, and duly deported when he got out of jail.. even if he had a local spouse and children...
next what? eat his liver?
As an act of public service to discourage him from writing yet more drivel.calugaruvaxile wrote: neil humphreys. why would he be deported? for writing about his landlady???
Seems ICA didn't get the memo ...Brah wrote:As an act of public service to discourage him from writing yet more drivel.calugaruvaxile wrote: neil humphreys. why would he be deported? for writing about his landlady???
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
