It seems realistic. 17 died, over 300 injured. If Keppel port (or whatever) had an explosion at 3am, we'd see similar destruction but also just as few casualties.ecureilx wrote:What explosion ?
Ship news says the port is operating as usual without any problem ....
Ps, loads of Renault SUVs, VW beetles and VW SUVs burnt... about 5,000 of them .. I suspect the death toll must be much higher just by seeing how the cars were nearly vaporized ...
My 2 cents says, based on other news, the death "should" have been 170 or more.zzm9980 wrote: It seems realistic. 17 died, over 300 injured. If Keppel port (or whatever) had an explosion at 3am, we'd see similar destruction but also just as few casualties.
that they initially admitted 17, for me, seemed to be a miraclethe lynx wrote:50 plus as of now.
Latest News: China bans Drones !! (just kidding)
What's the acronym for 'You're kidding right? '.calugaruvaxile wrote:it's nowhere near a nuclear blast . if it was the smallest possible nuke, the guy filming would have been thown down by the shockwave. more like a 500 kg bomb
For reference the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were in the range of 16-21 kilotons (i.e. 16,000 tons of TNT). There were apparently some US nuclear artillery warheads that had yields in the 10-20 ton range for use as tactical demolition devices so I guess they are technically correct that it "was like a nuke" just a very very small one.The China Earthquake Networks Centre said the initial explosion, in a city with a population of nearly 7.5 million. had a power equivalent to three tonnes of TNT detonating, while the second was the equivalent of 21 tonnes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest