Not sure that's the solution for people who like to take a flight out ...calugaruvaxile wrote:in any case, they should just not allow balcony access. quick fix.
Not sure that's the solution for people who like to take a flight out ...calugaruvaxile wrote:in any case, they should just not allow balcony access. quick fix.
hope those pictures wont be circulating over the net again...lets hv some respect for the deadecureilx wrote: Well, there are some picture of the Aussie lady, minus the head![]()
And the latest guy, well, apparently nothing much was left, vs the Aussie Lady![]()
Google "curry puff syndicate NEA".Barnsley wrote:Any link to the Curry Puff Saga?
So one now, the other 5 days earlier and 5 days before the first one we had there the Brotzeit gathering. Coincident? I don't think so.bgd wrote:Pedestrians be carefulPal wrote:
An eyewitness, who was about 50 metres away when the body fell to the ground, told Channel NewsAsia that the body landed between the hotel's main entrance and the Raffles City Shopping Centre McDonald's entrance.
I think that is the first time I saw "revert" used properly in this country.ecureilx wrote:Maybe they should revert back to Westin Stamford.... to rid the bad energy![]()
I am getting deja vu , all over againthe lynx wrote:But should it be used with or without "back"?
Wind resistance (drag) increases as velocity increases, so it actually takes longer.Strong Eagle wrote:For a human body terminal velocity is about 120 m/h / 200 k/h / 56 m/s. From rest, it would take about 5.7 to 6.5 seconds to reach this velocity depending upon total wind resistance... (v = gt or t = v/g - no wind resistance).sundaymorningstaple wrote:How many feet does it take to reach terminal velocity?
Distance is calculated as d = 0.5 * g * t^2 = 0.5 * 9.8 * (5.7^2 to 6.5^2) = 160 to 207 meters or 525 to 680 feet. So, that person would either need to be up near the 50th story or higher or did not make contact with terra firma at terminal velocity.
There are "invisible grilles," narrowly spaced, tight wires for balconies that are available, ostensibly for child safety.calugaruvaxile wrote:in any case, they should just not allow balcony access. quick fix.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest