Our daily crockery is from IKEA, and for me it has been for 10+ years. It's plain white, robustly made, and inexpensive. Plus, I also know if stuff gets broken I can replace it with precisely the same product today.
That's why their kitchen stuff is also ideal to provide in a rental apartment, if it's let on a furnished basis. As if a tenant breaks patterned crockery, odds on that design has been discontinued, and then the landlord is obliged to replace everything of that same design. Reason being if a prospective tenant opens a kitchen cupboard and sees a whole jumble of random crockery it creates a very negative impression, whereas a visually 'clean' stack of all white crockery suggests order and has positive appeal. [And no prospective tenant ever starts picking up crockery to see who it's manufactured by!]. But if you replace a whole range of patterned items when the tenant only broke a few items, it is *guaranteed* to kick off WW3.
p.s. I was curious whether it was Tott or Totts. Perhaps a victim of local mis-pluralisation. Nope, apparently it's the acronym for 'Tools of the trade'... so FWIW (very little, I know

) it is indeed Tott.