If an employer looks at your EP or PEP status or whatever, they are of SME mentality, in which case, the base pay to fulfill your PEP will be not likely to be metAmerican wrote:My reasoning that a PEP candidate would be more favorable, compared to a similar candidate (similar background/experience/education/skills), is that the hiring company does not have to apply for an EP, shortening the timeframe to start work and eliminating the risk of EP rejection.
Wow , I am really in the wrong field.ecureilx wrote:
Like a company I am working closely with, they are a start up, pay top $ for engineers, and they cross 12K and above a month, and most are on EP, and some guys have never been to Singapore until they secured the job.
This is excellent feedback and I appreciate the perspective. It comes down to the specialized skillset that drives your offer not the fact that it is slightly more convenient to hire you. A highly reputable company will focus on skills not ease of hiring as an EP vs PEP are negligible. I guess a PEP was designed for convenience for the PEP holder vs making it easier for companies to hire you.curiousgeorge wrote:You mean more favourable to the company? I guess technically it saves them a little bit of work applying for an EP, but if they are considering candidates at the kind of salary level that is required for a PEP, then chances of refusing the EP are slim anyway. Another way of looking at it - with a PEP you can change jobs more easily than an EP candidate, but a PEP candidate is more likely to be in Singapore already and thus less/no relocation costs.
I think for any company the priority would be the right person for the job. PR and Citizens with the same skillset would be preferable in any case...
12k is on the low sidebro75 wrote:Wow , I am really in the wrong field.ecureilx wrote:
Like a company I am working closely with, they are a start up, pay top $ for engineers, and they cross 12K and above a month, and most are on EP, and some guys have never been to Singapore until they secured the job.
bro75 wrote:Wow , I am really in the wrong field.ecureilx wrote:
Like a company I am working closely with, they are a start up, pay top $ for engineers, and they cross 12K and above a month, and most are on EP, and some guys have never been to Singapore until they secured the job.
ErrrrrrrWd40 wrote: I am in the right field, but I am not sure if I am the right person. .
ecureilx wrote:ErrrrrrrWd40 wrote: I am in the right field, but I am not sure if I am the right person. .
Elsewhere, many moon ago, you did say how to make your boss happy![]()
and with talent like that I thought you do great
Seems my original post has been taken out of context to "fuel the flames" -c'est la vie, it is public domain. Won't stop me from contributing and benefiting from this forum going forward. Much appreciated to hear personal feedback from those with past PEP experiences, beyond the officially stated rules - that's what forums are for after all, to hear from others with past experiences, beyond just reviewing the officially documented laws. It's a global economy that is becoming more and more borderless, and less "protectionalist". If a country is focused on economic growth and innovation, it's in it's interest to pick and choose from a diverse, global talent pool. America's Silicon Valley wouldn't be Silicon Valley, and Singapore wouldn't be Singapore, without talent beyond it's borders. We live in an Alpha World City and I assume many would like to keep it that way. Some day, my current skills will be obsolete as another "foreigner" will be able to do it cheaper, better, or faster, or all of the above. It's about staying ahead of the curve, advancing and improving current capabilities, and competing in the global economy.Wd40 wrote:This post is now getting discussed elsewhere:
http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/06/05/an ... work-pass/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests