My daughter just had a new audio head unit put in her car, can't remember the brand but it is designed to be driven by an iPhone. It uses Siri and apparently is very successfully hearing my daughter speak and converting to text messages while she is driving. Maybe the car environment is more suitable or the microphone better quality I don't know.zzm9980 wrote:I'm the biggest Apple fan boy on this forum, but to me the watch is ridiculous. I don't see how it helps. Siri (apple's voice input) is terribly unreliable, so you can't really use it to create messages. All the watch is going to do is tell you that you need to look at your phone. Why not just look at your phone more?
I'm glued to my phone and use Siri constantly to dictate messages. Siri is extremely dependent on network connection. You'll have completely different results based on being on Wifi, 4G, 3G, or one provider vs. the other. More so than even audio background noise. And the funny part is, the "better" connection doesn't always make Siri more reliable. A lot of it is the backend latency from your provider back to Apple's infrastructure (I have some insight into this). I've had Siri work perfectly, go into an elevator, watch my signal cycle from 4g, to nothing, and back to full 4G, but now I have a new route to a different end-point and it works terribly.Steve1960 wrote:My daughter just had a new audio head unit put in her car, can't remember the brand but it is designed to be driven by an iPhone. It uses Siri and apparently is very successfully hearing my daughter speak and converting to text messages while she is driving. Maybe the car environment is more suitable or the microphone better quality I don't know.zzm9980 wrote:I'm the biggest Apple fan boy on this forum, but to me the watch is ridiculous. I don't see how it helps. Siri (apple's voice input) is terribly unreliable, so you can't really use it to create messages. All the watch is going to do is tell you that you need to look at your phone. Why not just look at your phone more?
I think early adoption of the watch is probably a mistake but if the second generation has more features like blood pressure monitor, sleep tracking etc then there could be a user case for it.
In-car systems make more sense since it is a relatively closed system...unless you're driving with jackasses.Steve1960 wrote:My daughter just had a new audio head unit put in her car, can't remember the brand but it is designed to be driven by an iPhone. It uses Siri and apparently is very successfully hearing my daughter speak and converting to text messages while she is driving. Maybe the car environment is more suitable or the microphone better quality I don't know.zzm9980 wrote:I'm the biggest Apple fan boy on this forum, but to me the watch is ridiculous. I don't see how it helps. Siri (apple's voice input) is terribly unreliable, so you can't really use it to create messages. All the watch is going to do is tell you that you need to look at your phone. Why not just look at your phone more?
I think early adoption of the watch is probably a mistake but if the second generation has more features like blood pressure monitor, sleep tracking etc then there could be a user case for it.
A more recent version can also be eaten:zzm9980 wrote:I'm the biggest Apple fan boy on this forum, but to me the watch is ridiculous. I don't see how it helps. Siri (apple's voice input) is terribly unreliable, so you can't really use it to create messages. All the watch is going to do is tell you that you need to look at your phone. Why not just look at your phone more?
Needs a narration by Jony Ive.x9200 wrote:A more recent version can also be eaten:zzm9980 wrote:I'm the biggest Apple fan boy on this forum, but to me the watch is ridiculous. I don't see how it helps. Siri (apple's voice input) is terribly unreliable, so you can't really use it to create messages. All the watch is going to do is tell you that you need to look at your phone. Why not just look at your phone more?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests