but the space achievements were pretty impressiverajagainstthemachine wrote:Go India! We aren't even on that list of science and math toppers!
This kind of ranking exercise can do a lot of harm. So much of the human experiences simplify can't be quantify. It is in the human nature to love a challenge, to be curious and inquisitive. Giving people a test score, grading and labeling them this way end up commoditizing education. And we end up commoditizing humanity.But a leading UK head teacher, Sir Anthony Seldon, criticised such league tables as "arguably doing more harm than good".
"They are skewing schools and national education systems away from real learning towards repetitive rote learning," said Sir Anthony, head of Wellington College in Berkshire.
... and then importing FTs when any creative thinking is needed.earthfriendly wrote:Giving people a test score, grading and labeling them this way end up commoditizing education. And we end up commoditizing humanity.
JR8 wrote:... and then importing FTs when any creative thinking is needed.earthfriendly wrote:Giving people a test score, grading and labeling them this way end up commoditizing education. And we end up commoditizing humanity.
My impression is that there have been and are some baseline expectations for employability prospects. What did it used to be back in the 70s? - 5 'O'-levels? And if you got 8 you were doing well, clearly bright. By the 80s, that morphed into 8 O's, and say 2 A's. If you had more you were a swot; studying 3 'A's was the required route for tertiary education.Barnsley wrote:It would appear that a lot of the education systems around the world are heading towards exam results as the be all and end all.
If that is the case , where are the critical thinkers going to come from?
The rebels.Barnsley wrote:It would appear that a lot of the education systems around the world are heading towards exam results as the be all and end all.
If that is the case , where are the critical thinkers going to come from?
Why, they're selling at large profit their worthless 'badged' opinions and tin gongs to eager governments.x9200 wrote:I am only surprised the organizations responsible for such rankings don't see the whole nonsense of what they have created.
Which con is it? There's so many, I can't even start to think which one it could be.ecureilx wrote:The funny part is, a friend, a well property agent earning 5 figure pay monthly, got scammed overseas by a extremely simple con in the Ph..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests