rarkins wrote:Hi JR8, no - not an agent or in training. I'm just careful (as per forum rules) not to link to the site I use to research travel times, so type condo names in by hand here. Funny you mention districts though, as I thought *only* agents really care about them and don't understand why the real estate industry is so fixated on them. I think they're one of the more distracting factors of learning where to live in Singapore and people moving here would be better off ignoring them completely and instead referring to area names, e.g. river valley, marine parade, tanglin, holland village, etc.
That's gold. Gotta save this.sundaymorningstaple wrote:For the record, the "Districts" were based on the old postal code system before current 6 digits code system which came into effect in 1995. Prior to that it was a 4 digit postal code and the first two integers were used by the real estate industry to conveniently map out the island into identifiable zones. They still use that old zone map today as it is much easier than the 6 digit zipcode of today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_codes_in_Singapore
Ah, so young ah?the lynx wrote:That's gold. Gotta save this.
And now, 287172 refers to precisely one address in Watten Estates.sundaymorningstaple wrote:For the record, the "Districts" were based on the old postal code system before current 6 digits code system which came into effect in 1995. Prior to that it was a 4 digit postal code and the first two integers were used by the real estate industry to conveniently map out the island into identifiable zones. They still use that old zone map today as it is much easier than the 6 digit zipcode of today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_codes_in_Singapore
Well of course there is, and it's created by the locals.rarkins wrote:That history of the districts explains though why I think their use for real estate is frustrating. They're too big and arbitrary so don't really represent contiguous neighbourhoods in contemporary Singapore. I think it gives newcomers the mistaken impression that there's some Hunger Games-like importance of "the districts". As mentioned earlier, when generalising about locations I prefer the URA's planning areas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_plan ... _Singapore
Yup. W11 is better than W14. W6 is so-so and of course W8 is good too. Just like NW3 is better than NW6. NW8 is favoured by Japanese. No no to NW10JR8 wrote:Well of course there is, and it's created by the locals.rarkins wrote:That history of the districts explains though why I think their use for real estate is frustrating. They're too big and arbitrary so don't really represent contiguous neighbourhoods in contemporary Singapore. I think it gives newcomers the mistaken impression that there's some Hunger Games-like importance of "the districts". As mentioned earlier, when generalising about locations I prefer the URA's planning areas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_plan ... _Singapore
Back home we have W2, W10, W11, W8, W9, W11, and so on, and I know all the nuances that come underneath that.
Why would one change that, ever? Something to hide? Here, everything is about the status of district, and everyone knows 'that number'. What, you think by scrambling the postal code system, that the leopard will be forced to lose his spots?
Thanks rarkins. Personally, I find having condo names quite useful, particularly once you have managed to narrow down your search to particular neighborhoods. The districts are a good reference point (mainly to understand what locals are talking about when they say 'D11' etc) but for accommodation hunting aren't very helpful, because they are quite large.rarkins wrote:I see what you're getting at. I just figured that ultimately they're after condo suggestions, but happy to add area names too where relevant.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests