Is it really compulsory to give a reason to cancel DP ?Bellaboo wrote:Legal Eagle advice urgently needed regarding a PEP holder cancelling a wifes DP.
I believe there are certain reasons that must be specified to MOM to justify the cancellation. Can anyone clarify what they are?
And trust me, this is dire and urgent so helpful advice most welcome.
If one is cancelling a DP, then there are three possible reasons that this is being done. First, the EP/PEP to which the DP is attached has become a PR. In this case the DP would be converted to a LTVP(+) and that would be the reason for the DP cancellation.Bellaboo wrote:Legal Eagle advice urgently needed regarding a PEP holder cancelling a wifes DP.
I believe there are certain reasons that must be specified to MOM to justify the cancellation. Can anyone clarify what they are?
And trust me, this is dire and urgent so helpful advice most welcome.
You seem to confuse having reasons with reporting the reasons. I don't see any information confirming that such reason have to be openly stated (reported) to the authorities.Bellaboo wrote:It is compulsory. Would you have your pass cancelled for no reason?
What all this have to do with your initial question? We may be fully sympathetic to your predicaments but the facts are as stated.Bellaboo wrote:Thank you for helpful advice.
To those that are so blasé about the process ..... what if you weren't leaving the country? What if the PEP holder was simply holding you to ransom and had a list of demands under which you would have your pass reinstated? What if it meant you'd be deported and away from the kids you have given birth to, raised and adored for all their lives? All because of someones malice and spite?
Then you are up shit creek. A DP associated with a regular EP requires that an employer or employment agent be the guarantor, and generally, the employer is the only one who would request that a DP be terminated. With a PEP however, it was the PEP holder who signed the sponsorship piece in the application, and that may give him additional powers.Bellaboo wrote:Thank you for helpful advice.
To those that are so blasé about the process ..... what if you weren't leaving the country? What if the PEP holder was simply holding you to ransom and had a list of demands under which you would have your pass reinstated? What if it meant you'd be deported and away from the kids you have given birth to, raised and adored for all their lives? All because of someones malice and spite?
Sad to see anybody in your situation but MOM takes the PEP holder as guarantor and the primary pass holder is the responsible person for his/her DPs.Bellaboo wrote:I have already removed the Facebook post.
And no ... I would not just leave the country with my children. There is a little bit of a kidnapping problem with that.
I am lodging a complaint with MOM about false statements made in regards to cancelling the DP. And I am doing what I always do ... fighting for the well being of my children.
Sorry to hear about your predicament. Unfortunately, DP is considered as a privilege tied to a employment/resident visa to bring family members in the eyes of MOM. Plus DP is not an employment visa by itself. MOM would have been more concerned of an EP being terminated on unfair grounds than a DP of PEP being terminated on unfair grounds.Bellaboo wrote:Nope. I am not the PEP holder.
I am the very very badly damaged result of an abusive husband. Who is now abusing me even though he left me. Emotional abuse is no less painful than physical.
It is most certainly not MOMs job to fix broken marriages. But it is their job to step in when false declarations have been made.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests