But a colleague was asked why he didn't mention his previous Jay walking fine...the lynx wrote:If I remember correctly, the form asks specifically if you are convicted in Singapore for any crime. Littering is not the basis for conviction (it was liable to fine only), so if your application gets rejected, I'd hardly think that's the cause.
He was asked this at what point?ecureilx wrote:But a colleague was asked why he didn't mention his previous Jay walking fine...the lynx wrote:If I remember correctly, the form asks specifically if you are convicted in Singapore for any crime. Littering is not the basis for conviction (it was liable to fine only), so if your application gets rejected, I'd hardly think that's the cause.
I know it's debatable, but for me it's better to put a note on the form than be accused for lying to a civil servant
I recall, it was when he was submitting the form.x9200 wrote:He was asked this at what point?ecureilx wrote:But a colleague was asked why he didn't mention his previous Jay walking fine...the lynx wrote:If I remember correctly, the form asks specifically if you are convicted in Singapore for any crime. Littering is not the basis for conviction (it was liable to fine only), so if your application gets rejected, I'd hardly think that's the cause.
I know it's debatable, but for me it's better to put a note on the form than be accused for lying to a civil servant
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests