Same goes for Maids too with most of the levies being enforced by their own govtrajagainstthemachine wrote:https://www.facebook.com/thepeopleofsin ... 73/?type=1
...
Singapore is the only "first world country" where it is so actively tolerated.whiteflag wrote:it's happening everywhere,not only in Singapore
of course many wouldn't imagine it happening in Singapore
...which means they are hired using kick-back method. The employer falsely declares their income as EP-level income and then deducts back. This is illegal.joiedevivre22 wrote:This is just sad.
Last week, I went to a beauty parlour in Little India. As I was getting my facial done, the girl engaged in some small talk. She causally asked where I am from, what I do and if I am a PR. I was asking her similar questions ( by experience, most in such parlours are locals (SC or PR or DP) as it's hard for them to get EP/S Pass). She said she is an EP holder! I was shocked because I didn't know they were paid $3K plus but kept mum. As time went by, she told me how it works.
There are six girls working, all on EP. They are paid $1000 a month + given breakfast and dinner. They work 12 hours a day, stay in dormitory style rooms ( own cost) and are given 10 days paid leave to go back to India. If they go for more than 10 days, salary is cut on a daily basis. If sick, can take a MC ( own cost).
The parlour is owned by a SC ( indian origin). I was pleaded not to voice this to her boss or to MOM as she may lose her job if they close down. Further, she has paid 5K as an agent's fee to get this job.
Their EP's are given in another SME's name.
This is what is sad. People who find out about the ruse that is going on and don't do anything about it. Okay, so you feel sorry for her and she pleaded for you to not tell and they will lose their jobs. What is worse? 6 girls lose their jobs and the errant employers get whacked and lose their business license and the MOM then knows what to look for for the rest of the industry, and you have saved maybe hundreds of other from being exploited, or you watch and just let it continue?joiedevivre22 wrote:This is just sad.
The parlour is owned by a SC ( indian origin). I was pleaded not to voice this to her boss or to MOM as she may lose her job if they close down.
I agree. If I do have to complain, I need to know more about it. Just one girl's complaint is not proof enough and I will see if I can get more info on this.sundaymorningstaple wrote:This is what is sad. People who find out about the ruse that is going on and don't do anything about it. Okay, so you feel sorry for her and she pleaded for you to not tell and they will lose their jobs. What is worse? 6 girls lose their jobs and the errant employers get whacked and lose their business license and the MOM then knows what to look for for the rest of the industry, and you have saved maybe hundreds of other from being exploited, or you watch and just let it continue?joiedevivre22 wrote:This is just sad.
The parlour is owned by a SC ( indian origin). I was pleaded not to voice this to her boss or to MOM as she may lose her job if they close down.
If you are not part of the solution, you become part of the problem.
You need to quite patronizing that shop for starters. Your continued usage of the shop is tacit approval of what the employer is doing. Remember, a single journey starts with the first step. Also, you cannot make an omelet without first breaking a few eggs.joiedevivre22 wrote:Just one girl's complaint is not proof enough and I will see if I can get more info on this.
plus MOM has been progressively updating the rules putting in more protective measures to safeguard the workerssundaymorningstaple wrote:You need to quite patronizing that shop for starters. Your continued usage of the shop is tacit approval of what the employer is doing. Remember, a single journey starts with the first step. Also, you cannot make an omelet without first breaking a few eggs.joiedevivre22 wrote:Just one girl's complaint is not proof enough and I will see if I can get more info on this.
You certainly are an interesting character , here you are speaking out against exploiting workers , yet on another thread you are advocating sending folk to jail "because its obvious they did it" .....ecureilx wrote:Same goes for Maids too with most of the levies being enforced by their own govtrajagainstthemachine wrote:https://www.facebook.com/thepeopleofsin ... 73/?type=1
...
Copy/past of something somebody wrote somewhere.. about Maid's processing fees !!
Try to find who is more at Fault, the host country or the source country .. in this case !
Philippines authentic contract has nothing to do with Employer. It is Philippines' demand on its citizens... to earn from its citizens working as Domestic Workers. In Spore, employers will honour and abide with the terms legislated by Ministry of Manpower. Employers DO NOT NEED TO PAY FOR FILIPINO MAID EMBASSY'S HOME LEAVE (which includes Philippines authentic contract/OWWA/OEC).
If FDW wants to take home leave, she is agreeing to feed her embassy her hard earned cash. If FDW didn't complete 2-year contract and requested for advance home leave, the embassy has tied with Spore maid agencies to earn more from Filipinos.... their own citizens. US$400 is equivalent to S$500 salary... go and ask the forex exchange and you'll know Employers didn't short-change you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest