Lynx!the lynx wrote: For heaven's sake, I hope you really didn't go there yourself....
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/119.gif)
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Not talking [-(](./images/smilies/eusa_snooty.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
No, it was Mrs. JR8 that had that 'privilege', an auntie-duty. I was invited, but wouldn't be seen dead at such an event
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/110.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Lynx!the lynx wrote: For heaven's sake, I hope you really didn't go there yourself....
the new drinking laws kick in from April, and some felt that may be helping struggling pubs competing with 7-11 and Cheers ..JR8 wrote:No kidding. But who owns the head-leases at CQ, that was the largest factor that ran them into the ground? ...Barnsley wrote:Maybe folk are finally getting fed up of paying $25 for a pint ...........
Oh and limiting their alcohol license hours. The death-knell for them in turning a net profit.
you mean 'seemed' good ??retroman wrote:i go to AquaNova quite often and their business seems good
might be the ever increasing high rental problem
the outside area was normally full when i goecureilx wrote:you mean 'seemed' good ??retroman wrote:i go to AquaNova quite often and their business seems good
might be the ever increasing high rental problem
And even silly that Lifebrandz washed their hands off, saying they sub-con'd it to Massive !the lynx wrote:Looks like MOM court could only fight for half of the employees affected by this. The rest had to go to Small Claims Tribunal instead. I think MOM can only pursue your case if you are not on contract.
Heard one Mulligan's ex-employee attempted suicide at Singapore River in desperation. He survived (unfortunately or fortunately, that's subjective). Wasn't covered by the media though. He is now under arrest for attempted suicide.
I felt like telling the police that they would be going after the employer who drove him to suicide. Why is the victim being prosecuted here?!
Lucky investorsrajagainstthemachine wrote:heh!
He said: "Having considered the intense competition that the subsidiaries have been facing and continues to face, the trend of diminishing crowd spending and the impact of the restriction on liquor licensing hours, the Board has determined that the operations of the affected venues is presently not sustainable or commercially viable, and that the named subsidiaries cannot continue as a going concern."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests